A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Inhibitory and Facilitatory Cueing Effects: Competition between Exogenous and Endogenous Mechanisms. | LitMetric

Inhibitory and Facilitatory Cueing Effects: Competition between Exogenous and Endogenous Mechanisms.

Vision (Basel)

Division of Psychology, School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania 7248, Australia.

Published: August 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • Inhibition of return delays responses to previously attended locations, especially with longer cue-target onset intervals, while quicker reaction times are typically seen when a cue positively predicts a target's location.
  • In a series of experiments, different levels of cue predictability (25%, 50%, and 75%) were tested to examine the effects of predictive and inhibitory cueing on saccadic reaction times.
  • Results showed stronger inhibitory effects in counterpredictive scenarios compared to nonpredictive ones, with no inhibition in the predictive condition, suggesting that opposing mechanisms can balance out when both facilitation and inhibition occur at the same location.

Article Abstract

Inhibition of return is characterized by delayed responses to previously attended locations when the cue-target onset asynchrony (CTOA) is long enough. However, when cues are predictive of a target's location, faster reaction times to cued as compared to uncued targets are normally observed. In this series of experiments investigating saccadic reaction times, we manipulated the cue predictability to 25% (counterpredictive), 50% (nonpredictive), and 75% (predictive) to investigate the interaction between predictive endogenous facilitatory (FCEs) and inhibitory cueing effects (ICEs). Overall, larger ICEs were seen in the counterpredictive condition than in the nonpredictive condition, and no ICE was found in the predictive condition. Based on the hypothesized additivity of FCEs and ICEs, we reasoned that the null ICEs observed in the predictive condition are the result of two opposing mechanisms balancing each other out, and the large ICEs observed with counterpredictive cueing can be attributed to the combination of endogenous facilitation at uncued locations with inhibition at cued locations. Our findings suggest that the endogenous activity contributed by cue predictability can reduce the overall inhibition observed when the mechanisms occur at the same location, or enhance behavioral inhibition when the mechanisms occur at opposite locations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802798PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3030040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cueing effects
8
reaction times
8
cue predictability
8
predictive condition
8
ices observed
8
mechanisms occur
8
predictive
5
ices
5
inhibitory facilitatory
4
facilitatory cueing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!