Donor-Recipient Relationship and Risk of ESKD in Live Kidney Donors of Varied Racial Groups.

Am J Kidney Dis

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN.

Published: March 2020

Rationale & Objective: Risk factors for kidney failure are the basis of live kidney donor candidate evaluation. We quantified risk for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by the biological relationship of the donor to the recipient, a risk factor that is not addressed by current clinical practice guidelines.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants: A cohort of 143,750 US kidney donors between 1987 and 2017.

Exposure: Biological relationship of donor and recipient.

Outcome: ESKD. Donors' records were linked to national dialysis and transplantation registries to ascertain development of the outcome.

Analytic Approach: Donors were observed over a median of 12 (interquartile range, 6-18; maximum, 30) years. Survival analysis methods that account for the competing risk for death were used.

Results: Risk for ESKD varied by orders of magnitude across donor-recipient relationship categories. For Asian donors, risks compared with unrelated donors were 259.4-fold greater for identical twins (95% CI, 19.5-3445.6), 4.7-fold greater for full siblings (95% CI, 0.5-41.0), 3.5-fold greater for offspring (95% CI, 0.6-39.5), 1.0 for parents, and 1.0 for half-sibling or other biological relatives. For black donors, risks were 22.5-fold greater for identical twin donors (95% CI, 4.7-107.0), 4.1-fold for full siblings (95% CI, 2.1-7.8), 2.7-fold for offspring (95% CI, 1.4-5.4), 3.1-fold for parents (95% CI, 1.4-6.8), and 1.3-fold for half-sibling or other biological relatives (95% CI, 0.5-3.3). For white donors, risks were 3.5-fold greater for identical twin donors (95% CI, 0.5-25.3), 2.0-fold for full siblings (95% CI, 1.4-2.8), 1.4-fold for offspring (95% CI, 0.9-2.3), 2.9-fold for parents (95% CI, 2.0-4.1), and 0.8-fold for half-sibling or other biological relatives (95% CI, 0.3-1.6).

Limitations: Insufficient sample size in some race and relationship groups. Absence of data for family history of kidney disease for donors biologically unrelated to their recipients.

Conclusions: Marked differences in risk for ESKD across types of donor-recipient relationship were observed for Asian, black, and white donors. These findings warrant further validation with more robust data to better inform clinical practice guidelines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042071PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

95%
13
donor-recipient relationship
12
risk eskd
12
donors risks
12
greater identical
12
full siblings
12
siblings 95%
12
offspring 95%
12
half-sibling biological
12
biological relatives
12

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study measured fibrinogen fluorescence at temperatures between 20 and 80 degrees Celsius across different pH levels.
  • It was found that raising the temperature from 20 to 40 degrees Celsius did not change the structure of fibrinogen in solutions with pH between 4.5 and 9.3.
  • However, temperatures between 40 to 50 degrees Celsius caused some structural changes in neutral solutions, and temperatures above 50-55 degrees Celsius led to significant denaturation of the fibrinogen molecule.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!