Healing of Diabetic Neuroischemic Foot Wounds With vs Without Wound-Targeted Revascularization: Preliminary Observations From an 8-Year Prospective Dual-Center Registry.

To assess the clinical efficacy of endovascular angiosome-oriented wound-targeted revascularization (WTR) vs indirect (wound-indifferent) revascularization (IR) in diabetic patients with neuroischemic foot ulcers. Between April 2009 and July 2017, 167 diabetic patients (mean age 72.8 years; 137 men) with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (Rutherford category 5) and foot wounds (Wagner 2-4) in 194 limbs were prospectively registered and scheduled for primary infragenicular endovascular treatment. Specific angiosome source artery reperfusion sustained by patent foot arches or arterial-arterial connections was attempted initially. If this approach failed, topographic revascularization via available collaterals (WTRc) and IR were sequentially attempted. Reperfusion was successful in 176 (91%) of 194 limbs (113 with WTR, 28 with WTRc, and 35 with IR); the global angiosome-oriented technical success (WTR and WTRc) was 73% (141/194). The mean follow-up was 10.9±0.7 months (range 3-12.5). Over 1 year, 102 (58%) of the 176 successfully treated limbs experienced wound healing [79/113 (70%) in the WTR group, 15/28 (54%) in the WTRc group, and 7/35 (20%) in the IR group; p=0.011]. The mean time to healing was 6.8±0.4 months in the WTR group, 7.9±0.6 months in the WTRc group, and 9.8±0.7 months in the IR group (p=0.001). Relapses were noted in 18 (16%) WTR limbs, 5 (18%) WTRc limbs, and 6 (17%) IR limbs. Comparison between WTR and IR and WTRc vs IR showed improved cicatrization in the angiosome-oriented groups (p<0.05). Major adverse limb events (MALE) and limb salvage were different between WTR and WTRc and between WTR and IR groups (p<0.05), while WTRc vs IR was not. Amputation-free survival was not influenced by the revascularization strategy (p=0.093). Wound healing in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia appeared to be improved by intentional wound-targeted revascularization, but no uniform benefit concerning MALE or limb preservation was observed. IR still represents an alternative for limb salvage in cases in which angiosome-guided revascularization fails.