[Glass ceiling and gender inequalities in the careers of women academics in biomedical sciences].

Gac Sanit

Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, España; Grup de Recerca en Cures de la Salut (GRECS), Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida), Lleida, España; Grupo de Estudios Sociedad, Salud, Educación y Cultura (GESEC), Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, España.

Published: October 2021

Objective: To identify in the international scientific literature the obstacles and potential promoters for the advancement of women academics and researchers in biomedical sciences during their professional careers.

Method: PubMed, Scopus, CinahlPlus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycInfo and Sociological Abstracts were systematically searched for articles published in English and Spanish between January 2006 and December 2016 on the phenomenon of the glass ceiling in women academics and researchers in biomedical sciences. The screening was carried out by independent reviewers.

Results: A total of 2254 studies were found, of which 23 were included in the review. The obstacles identified for the promotion of women academics and/or researchers in biomedical sciences are: gender bias in the evaluation of research results, individualism and lack of collaboration, women's lack of influence, the existence of gender inequalities in access to employment. The perception of sexism and discrimination in the work environment, and the difficulties in reconciling work and family life. The promoting elements are: examples of women in leadership positions, mentoring, facilitating conciliation, transparency in recruitment, participation in decision-making, gender assessment of research, awareness of gender inequalities in institutions, promoting collaboration, and pay equity.

Conclusions: By enhancing the elements favouring the promotion of academic women in biomedical sciences would help to reduce the glass ceiling in the career paths of women academics and health science researchers by increasing their participation, leadership and representation. A change of organizational and institutional values is required to achieve this.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.10.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

women academics
20
biomedical sciences
16
gender inequalities
12
researchers biomedical
12
academics researchers
8
glass ceiling
8
women
7
gender
5
academics
5
biomedical
5

Similar Publications

Pessary Placement for Voiding Dysfunction Due to Prolapse Among Neurologically Intact Women.

Urogynecology (Phila)

January 2025

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Importance: Literature surrounding conservative management of voiding dysfunction (VD) due to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is limited.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of pessaries on VD in women with symptomatic POP.

Study Design: This was a retrospective case series of adult women who underwent a pessary fitting for POP and VD between January 2010 to December 2022 at 2 tertiary care centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose Of Review: To summarize the current treatment landscape of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) in the context of the recent 2023 American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians guideline for ILD treatment in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Recent Findings: The guideline conditionally recommends mycophenolate, azathioprine, and rituximab for first-line RA-ILD therapy, with cyclophosphamide and short-term glucocorticoids as additional options. For RA-ILD progression after first line, mycophenolate, rituximab, nintedanib, tocilizumab, cyclophosphamide, and pirfenidone are conditionally recommended, while long-term glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended against.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Large-scale evaluation of outcomes after a genetic diagnosis in children with severe developmental disorders.

Genet Med Open

October 2024

Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Medical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Purpose: We sought to evaluate outcomes for clinical management after a genetic diagnosis from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study.

Methods: Individuals in the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study who had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic genotype in the DECIPHER database were selected for inclusion ( = 5010). Clinical notes from regional clinical genetics services notes were reviewed to assess predefined clinical outcomes relating to interventions, prenatal choices, and information provision.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Opioid use disorder (OUD) impacts millions of people worldwide. Prior studies investigating its underpinning neural mechanisms have not often considered how brain signals evolve over time, so it remains unclear whether brain dynamics are altered in OUD and have subsequent behavioral implications.

Objective: To characterize brain dynamic alterations and their association with cognitive control in individuals with OUD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!