AI Article Synopsis

  • One-third of patients with RAS wild-type mCRC don't respond to anti-EGFR treatments like cetuximab, prompting a study on using [Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT imaging to predict who would benefit.
  • Visual tumor uptake was seen in 66% of patients, but no clear correlation was found between PET results and treatment success or survival rates.
  • The study concluded that [Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT is not an effective predictive biomarker for treatment benefit in these patients, with other genetic factors like BRAF mutations linked to cetuximab resistance.

Article Abstract

Purpose: One-third of patients with RAS wild-type mCRC do not benefit from anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. This might be a result of variable pharmacokinetics and insufficient tumor targeting. We evaluated cetuximab tumor accumulation on [Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT as a potential predictive biomarker and determinant for an escalating dosing strategy.

Patients And Methods: PET/CT imaging of [Zr]Zr-cetuximab (37 MBq/10 mg) after a therapeutic pre-dose (500 mg/m ≤ 2 h) cetuximab was performed at the start of treatment. Patients without visual tumor uptake underwent dose escalation and a subsequent [Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT. Treatment benefit was defined as stable disease or response on CT scan evaluation after 8 weeks.

Results: Visual tumor uptake on [Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT was observed in 66% of 35 patients. There was no relationship between PET positivity and treatment benefit (52% versus 80% for PET-negative, P = 0.16), progression-free survival (3.6 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.15), or overall survival (7.1 versus 9.4 months, P = 0.29). However, in 67% of PET-negative patients, cetuximab dose escalation (750-1250 mg/m) was applied, potentially influencing outcome in this group. None of the second [Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT was positive. Eighty percent of patients without visual tumor uptake had treatment benefit, making [Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT unsuitable as a predictive biomarker. Tumor SUV did not correlate to changes in tumor size on CT (P = 0.23), treatment benefit, nor progression-free survival. Cetuximab pharmacokinetics were not related to treatment benefit. BRAF mutations, right-sidedness, and low sEGFR were correlated with intrinsic resistance to cetuximab.

Conclusion: Tumor uptake on [Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT failed to predict treatment benefit in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab monotherapy. BRAF mutations, right-sidedness, and low sEGFR correlated with intrinsic resistance to cetuximab.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076055PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04555-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

[zr]zr-cetuximab pet/ct
28
treatment benefit
24
tumor uptake
16
patients ras
12
ras wild-type
12
visual tumor
12
[zr]zr-cetuximab
8
cetuximab monotherapy
8
wild-type mcrc
8
tumor
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!