Purpose: To evaluate whether stemless shoulder implants in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients provide comparable functional outcomes to patients with osteoarthritis or post-traumatic arthritis. In addition, the study assessed for differences in incidence of radiolucent lines or proximal humeral bone loss during radiographic follow-up.

Methods: Consecutive stemless shoulder arthroplasties performed in RA patients and a matched control group were retrospectively identified between February 2012 and 2018. Thirty-five patients were included in each group: 24 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and 11 hemiarthroplasty (HA). Patients were evaluated annually using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and radiographically.

Results: The mean OSS significantly improved in all groups until 24 months. The mean improvement for RA TSA and HA patients at 24 months was 19.86 (95% CI 10.66-29.05, p = 0.0004) and 19.71 (95% CI 7.33-32.31, p = 0.0084), respectively. The mean improvement in the control TSA and HA patients at 24 months was 20.86 (95% CI 17-24.71, p = 0.0001) and 17.86 (95% CI 1.36-34.35, p = 0.0381), respectively. During the study period, two patients in the RA TSA group (8%), one patient in the control TSA group (4%) and one patient in the control HA group (9%) required revision. The proportion of progressive proximal humeral bone loss after TSA was 33% in the RA group and 13% in the control group.

Conclusion: Stemless shoulder implants can provide significant improvement in functional scores in RA patients in the short term. However, early bone loss around the humeral implant is a concern and the authors recommend long-term clinical and radiological follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00629-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stemless shoulder
16
bone loss
12
patients
9
shoulder arthroplasty
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8
shoulder implants
8
proximal humeral
8
humeral bone
8
control group
8
tsa patients
8

Similar Publications

Background: This study aimed to determine the revision outcome between a centrally fixed stemless anatomic design and other total anatomic shoulder replacements using data from a large national arthroplasty registry.

Methods: The study period was from December 2011 to December 2022 and included three cohorts; primary Affinis stemless anatomic (AFS), all other primary total stemless anatomic (sTSA) and primary total stemmed anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). The endpoint was all-cause revision using cumulative percent revision (CPR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Successful subscapularis repair in stemless shoulder arthroplasty is crucial to reduce complications and improve postoperative function. As stemless shoulder arthroplasty continues to grow in popularity, several subscapularis tendon repair techniques are being developed, with a current trend toward knotless devices and double-row anchor-based constructs. In this article, we present our technique for repair of a subscapularis tendon peel using a suture-capture construct that aids in compression of the tendon onto its footprint and then gradually releases the tension as the capture resorbs and tendon healing occurs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Stemmed VS stemless total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

December 2024

Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland.

Aim: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is commonly used for glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with an intact rotator cuff. The aim of this study was to quantify advantages and disadvantages of the stemmed and stemless designs in terms of clinical outcome and complications.

Methods: A review was developed based on the PRISMA statement and registered on PROSPERO.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Humeral Stem Design in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

December 2024

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Ave MU-320W, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.

Purpose Of The Review: There have been tremendous modifications to the humeral component since Paul Grammont first introduced the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in 1985. The purpose of this article is to review historical design features and their drawbacks and to summarize the clinical outcomes of modern designs.

Recent Findings: Decreasing the neck-shaft angle and increasing humeral lateralization have helped address problems of scapular notching and limited internal and external rotation that were common with traditional designs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!