Non-vascularized partial joint transfer for Finger Proximal Interphalangeal joint reconstruction: a series of 9 patients.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Department of Plastic und Hand Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.

Published: January 2020

Introduction: Finger proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) reconstruction after the destruction of parts of the joint remains challenging. Surgical techniques include implant arthroplasty, arthrodesis, free vascularized joint transfer, and non-vascularized bone and joint transfer. This study analyzes our experience after non-vascularized transfer in terms of range of motion, postoperative rehabilitation, and patient satisfaction.

Materials And Methods: Between 2009 and 2014, ten patients underwent non-vascularized partial joint transfer for PIP joint reconstruction. One of them was lost to follow-up. Included patients had osteochondral partial joint transplants of 25-50% of the toes (n = 4) and the hand (n = 5). Range of motion (ROM), grip-, and pinch-strength were measured at the last follow-up control and compared to the healthy side. Patients were asked to score the pain at rest/ on load on a visual scale (VAS: 0 = no pain; 10 = excruciating pain). Satisfaction self-assessment was evaluated by asking the patients to grade their postoperative result as excellent, very good, good or poor.

Results: Mean follow-up period was 4.0 years (range 1.2-7.9 years). Mean PIP joint flexion was 93 ± 26° at the last follow-up control. Mean grip- and pinch-strength of the operated side at the last control were, respectively, 43 ± 18 kg and 8 ± 5 kg, close to the healthy side values (45 ± 15 kg and 9 ± 4 kg). Mean pain at rest/on load measured on a visual scale was, respectively, 0.3 ± 1 and 1.8 ± 2. Eight patients (89%) rated their operation as excellent, and one as poor.

Conclusion: In this study, non-vascularized partial joint transfer provides a mobile and stable PIP joint 4 years after reconstruction. The surgical technique presented herein is complex depending on additional injuries but results in great patient satisfaction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03301-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

joint transfer
20
partial joint
16
non-vascularized partial
12
joint
12
pip joint
12
finger proximal
8
proximal interphalangeal
8
interphalangeal joint
8
joint reconstruction
8
range motion
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!