Changing Leadership Behaviors in a Public Health Agency Through Coaching and Multirater Feedback.

J Public Health Manag Pract

Office of the Director, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Drs Dean and Myles and Ms Spears-Jones); and Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (Mss Porch and Parris). Ms Porch is now with Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Ms Parris is now with Agnes Scott College, Decatur, Georgia.

Published: October 2021

Context: Public health managers' leadership skills can be improved through multirater feedback and coaching.

Objective: To explore to what extent participation in a coaching intervention influences leadership behaviors of first- and second-level leaders in a federal public health agency.

Design: Team leads and branch chiefs in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP) were invited to participate in the Coaching and Leadership Initiative (CaLI), which incorporates the US Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Leadership 360 assessment, 6 coaching sessions, and 2 in-depth interviews.

Setting: NCHHSTP is one of 16 CDC national centers, institute, and offices.

Participants: Staff serving as team leads or branch chiefs.

Main Outcome Measures: Two in-depth interviews explored CaLI's influence on leadership behaviors regarding the government-wide Leading People executive core qualification.

Results: A total of 103 (93%) CaLI participants completed the OPM 360 feedback, 82 (80%) completed leadership coaching; 71 of 82 (87%) completed phase 1 interview, and 46 of 71 (65%) completed phase 2 interview. Eighty unique participants completed 1 or more interviews; all indicated that CaLI helped provide new perspectives, practices, and approaches that led to better communication and relationships, different approaches to conflict resolution, and awareness of individual leadership practices. Of the 71 participants who completed phase 1 evaluation, 66 (93%) said they made changes in developing others, 56 (79%) completed conflict management and team building, and 16 (23%) completed leveraging diversity. Of the 46 participants who completed both phase 1 and phase 2 interviews and among those who made changes post-CaLI, 23 of 26 (88%) sustained those leadership changes in developing others, 21 of 27 (78%) in team building; 24 of 34 (71%) in conflict management; and 5 of 10 (50%) in leveraging diversity.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the benefits and effectiveness of using multirater feedback and leadership coaching for first- and midlevel public health leaders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

public health
16
participants completed
16
completed phase
16
leadership behaviors
12
multirater feedback
12
leadership
9
completed
9
team leads
8
leads branch
8
leadership coaching
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!