The charts of 56 patients with chest pain who were admitted to the critical care units to rule out myocardial infarction were evaluated concurrently and retrospectively to compare the efficiency of cardiologists and internists. The number of unnecessary days used to rule out myocardial infarction, the number of unnecessary inhospital days used after ruling out myocardial infarction, the length of cardiac work-up, and the length of hospital stay were determined for 23 patients of cardiologists and 33 patients of internists. The cardiologists' patients had fewer unnecessary days after ruling out myocardial infarction (2.76 vs. 0.43 days, p less than .01) and a shorter length of hospital stay (5.15 vs. 2.91 days, p less than .02). We concluded that consideration should be given to increasing and refining the supplementary role of physician-experts to primary care physicians as one means of improved resource allocation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198811000-00003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

myocardial infarction
16
efficiency cardiologists
8
cardiologists internists
8
chest pain
8
rule myocardial
8
number unnecessary
8
unnecessary days
8
days ruling
8
ruling myocardial
8
length hospital
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!