A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

N-acetylcysteine versus chlorhexidine in treatment of aphthous ulcers: a preliminary clinical trial. | LitMetric

Introduction: This study sought to assess the efficacy of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) in the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS).

Methods: Fifty-eight patients, aged 28 ± 9.7 years, presented with clinically diagnosed RAS to two oral medicine centers. They were assigned randomly to a single application of either NAC (200 mg dissolved in water,  = 38) or 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX,  = 20) mouthwashes for 30 seconds. Pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The size of the ulcer was measured through its greatest dimension using a periodontal probe. These two measurements were taken pre-application (day 1) and 2nd, 4th, and 6th day post-application. Average time (in days) until complete healing was assessed.

Results: Of all participants, 33 (57%) were females; 34 (59%) married; 29 (50%) reported a family history of aphthae; and 51 (88%) were affected with minor RAS. There were greater improvement in pain from day 1 with NAC on the second day (-3.0 ± 2.0 versus -1.8 ± 1.9;  = .028) and on the fourth day (-5.0 ± 2.6 versus -3.4 ± 2.7;  = .041). The differences with regard to the change in ulcer size and average healing time were not significant between NAC and CHX.

Conclusion: Single application of NAC results in a clinically significant reduction of RAS-associated pain within one day of application and is more effective than CHX.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1688231DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single application
8
application nac
8
pain day
8
day
6
nac
5
n-acetylcysteine versus
4
versus chlorhexidine
4
chlorhexidine treatment
4
treatment aphthous
4
aphthous ulcers
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!