AI Article Synopsis
- The study investigates the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in detecting residual or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients after undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
- A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, analyzing 13 studies that included 721 nodules to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEMRI.
- Results showed high pooled sensitivity (91%) and specificity (93%) for CEMRI, indicating it is a reliable diagnostic tool, especially in prospective studies.
Article Abstract
Background: The diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in diagnosing residual or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently not completely clear.
Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of CEMRI in detecting residual or recurrent HCCs after TACE by meta-analysis.
Study Type: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Population: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library database up to June 2019 to find original studies on diagnosing patients suspected of residual or recurrent HCCs after TACE with CEMRI. Thirteen studies comprising 721 nodules were finally included.
Field Strength/sequence: 1.5T or 3.0T, CEMRI.
Assessment: Quality assessment of the included studies was performed by applying the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
Statistical Tests: Sensitivity and specificity were pooled with a bivariate random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-square test. The potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by subgroup and publication bias analyses.
Results: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of CEMRI in diagnosing residual or recurrent HCCs after TACE were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87%-96%), 93% (95% CI: 85%-97%), 12.22 (95% CI: 5.62-26.57), 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.18), 126.99 (95% CI: 34.76-436.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that CEMRI performed significantly better in prospective studies than in retrospective studies: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00) vs. 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96) with P < 0.05.
Data Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggested that CEMRI had high diagnostic efficacy in detecting residual or recurrent HCCs after TACE and may serve as an alternative method for further evaluation after TACE.
Level Of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1019-1028.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26970 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!