Introduction: Neuronox has not yet been investigated for its efficacy and safety in the treatment of lateral canthal lines (LCL).

Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, active drug controlled, multicenter, 16 week, Phase I/III study designed to determine the non-inferiority of Neuronox compared to onabotulinumtoxin A (ONA) in the treatment of moderate to severe LCL. Thirty subjects in Phase I and 220 subjects in Phase III were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single treatment (24 U) of either Neuronox or ONA. The primary endpoint of the Phase III study was the responder rate according to the proportion of subjects achieving Grade 0 (none) or 1 (mild) from 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) in LCL severity at maximum smile as assessed by the investigators at Week 4. Additional efficacy endpoints and safety endpoints (adverse events) were also evaluated.

Results: The primary endpoint was achieved as the proportion of responders was 83% for both Neuronox and ONA, thus, supporting the non-inferiority of Neuronox compare to ONA. The two groups also showed no statistical differences in safety analyses.

Conclusion: Treatment of moderate to severe LCL with Neuronox was effective and well-tolerated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1687818DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moderate severe
12
severe lcl
12
efficacy safety
8
lateral canthal
8
canthal lines
8
phase i/iii
8
randomized double-blind
8
non-inferiority neuronox
8
treatment moderate
8
subjects phase
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!