AI Article Synopsis

  • - Despite numeracy being crucial for 21st-century skills, many students in Western countries struggle to meet acceptable standards, leading to investigations into the effectiveness of math programs in classrooms.
  • - A study involving over 1,100 students and 193 teachers compared the JUMP Math program to standard problem-based approaches in 41 schools, tracking math achievement over two years.
  • - Results showed that junior students using JUMP Math had significant gains in computation, while primary students showed mixed results; overall, JUMP Math displays promise as an effective, evidence-based math instruction method, especially for teachers transitioning to new programs.

Article Abstract

Students in many western countries struggle to achieve acceptable standards in numeracy despite its recognition as an important 21st century skill. As commercial math programs remain a staple of classroom instruction, investigations of their effectiveness are essential to inform decision-making regarding how to invest limited resources while maximizing student gains. We conducted a cluster randomized-controlled trial of the effectiveness of JUMP Math, a distinctive math program whose central tenets are empirically supported, for improving elementary math achievement (clinical trial.gov no. NCT02456181). The study involved 554 grade 2 (primary) and 592 grade 5 (junior) students and 193 teachers in 41 schools, in an urban-rural Canadian school board. Schools were randomly assigned to use either JUMP Math or their business-as-usual, problem-based approach to math instruction. We tracked student progress in math achievement on standardized and curriculum-based measures of computation and problem solving, for 2 consecutive school years. Junior students taught with JUMP Math made significantly greater progress in computation than their non-JUMP peers but the groups did not differ significantly in problem solving. Effects took hold relatively quickly, replicating the results from an earlier pilot study. Primary students in the non-JUMP group made significantly greater gains in problem solving and computation in year 1. But those taught with JUMP Math made significantly greater gains in problem solving and the groups did not differ in computation, in year 2. The positive effects of JUMP Math are noteworthy given that the JUMP Math teachers were likely still adjusting to the new program. That these positive findings were obtained in an effectiveness study (i.e. in real-world conditions), suggests that JUMP Math may be a valuable evidence-based addition to the teacher's toolbox. Given the importance of numeracy for 21st century functioning, identifying and implementing effective math instruction programs could have far-reaching, positive implications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821143PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223049PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jump math
32
math
16
problem solving
16
math instruction
12
math achievement
12
trial effectiveness
8
jump
8
effectiveness jump
8
math program
8
improving elementary
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!