Purpose: To compare abutment displacement between the virtual, customized abutment that was designed on a cast and the customized abutment prepared in the oral cavity.

Materials And Methods: Eleven patients were selected for a single posterior implant prosthetic treatment. The impression was obtained using the closed tray impression method with a vinyl polysiloxane material using a custom tray. The standard tessellation language files of the customized abutment that was designed using the computer-aided design system and acquired with an intraoral scanner in the oral cavity were superimposed and analyzed for distance and angle displacement using the three-dimensional inspection analysis program (Geomagic Control X). In the statistical analysis, distance and angle displacement values were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis H test (α = 0.05), and a post hoc comparison was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Bonferroni correction method.

Results: The mean distance and angle displacement of the 15 customized abutments were 89.52 ± 66.86 µm and 0.83 ± 1.21°, respectively. There were significant differences in distance displacement (p < 0.001), and angle displacement (p < 0.001) among the 15 customized abutments, and there were no significant differences in angle displacement along the 4 directions (p = 0.735).

Conclusions: The displacement values of the customized abutments evaluated in the oral cavity differed significantly from patient to patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13120DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

angle displacement
20
customized abutments
16
oral cavity
12
customized abutment
12
distance angle
12
displacement
9
displacement customized
8
abutment designed
8
displacement values
8
displacement 0001
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!