AI Article Synopsis

  • The study looked at how well patients followed up with colorectal cancer screenings and whether it was worth the money spent.
  • Out of 94 patients, most (68%) got or were offered a follow-up procedure called a colonoscopy, which checks for cancer.
  • The screenings helped save a lot of healthcare costs, but if more patients got follow-ups, it could have saved even more money and improved health.

Article Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess adherence and costs-benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings from an accountable care organization/population health perspective. We performed a retrospective review of 94 patients (50-75 years of age) in an integrated safety net system for whom fecal CRC screening was abnormal for the period of June 1, 2014, to June 1, 2016. A cost-benefit model was constructed using Medicare payment rates and a sensitivity analysis. Most patients included in the study (64/94, 68%) received or were offered a colonoscopy. Of those receiving a colonoscopy, 24 of 45 (53%) had an abnormal finding. Total direct medical costs avoided by screening the patient panel was $32,926 but could have exceeded $63,237 had more patients received follow-up colonoscopies. A sensitivity analysis with 1000 patients demonstrated total monetary benefits between $2.2 million and $8.16 million when follow-up and colonoscopy rates were allowed to vary. Although the resulting rates of follow-up were within the range reported in the literature, there is room for improvement, especially considering the monetary benefit that could be used on other diseases. Health systems and payers should work cooperatively to structure payment models to better incentivize CRC screenings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6793958PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2019.1647702DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal cancer
8
crc screenings
8
sensitivity analysis
8
assessing adherence
4
adherence cost-benefit
4
cost-benefit colorectal
4
cancer screening
4
screening accountable
4
accountable providers
4
providers objective
4

Similar Publications

Fear of cancer recurrence in long-term colorectal cancer survivors: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

J Cancer Surviv

January 2025

The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture With Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, NSW, 2011, Australia.

Purpose: Knowledge about fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) among recurrence-free long-term colorectal cancer survivors (CRCS) is limited. This national cross-sectional study aimed to (1) assess the prevalence and correlates of FCR among CRCS; (2) investigate associations between colorectal cancer-specific symptoms and FCR; and (3) identify predictors of interest in engaging in FCR treatment.

Methods: We identified 9638 living Danish CRCS, age above 18 years, diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 through the Danish Clinical Registries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Marathon training and running have many beneficial effects on human health and physical fitness; however, they also pose risks. To date, no comprehensive review regarding both the benefits and risks of marathon running on different organ systems has been published.

Main Body: The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive review of the benefits and risks of marathon training and racing on different organ systems.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health challenge, marked by varying incidence and mortality rates across different regions. The pathogenesis of CRC involves multiple stages, including initiation, promotion, progression, and metastasis, influenced by genetic and epigenetic factors. The chaperone protein glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), crucial in regulating the unfolded protein response (UPR) during endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, plays a pivotal role in CRC pathogenesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Single-cell RNA sequencing and machine learning provide candidate drugs against drug-tolerant persister cells in colorectal cancer.

Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis

January 2025

Center for Mathematical Modeling and Data Science, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan. Electronic address:

Drug resistance often stems from drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells in cancer. These cells arise from various lineages and exhibit complex dynamics. However, effectively targeting DTP cells remains challenging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: A key element in ensuring appropriate balance of harms and benefits in cancer screening is to develop a priority set of performance and outcome indicators to be used in screening data evaluation systems. These indicators need to be equity-focused, aligned to new screening approaches and broad-based to cover possible opportunistic screening, but at the same time as limited as possible.

Study Design: Indicators for breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening programs were chosen through a consensus building Delphi methodology involving a panel of cancer screening experts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!