Stability of frozen 1% voriconazole eye-drops in both glass and innovative containers.

Eur J Pharm Sci

CHU Lille, Institut de Pharmacie, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ. Lille, EA 7365-GRITA-Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, F-59000 Lille, France.

Published: January 2020

Purpose: To assess the physico-chemical stability of Voriconazole Eye-Drops (VED), when stored frozen and refrigerated once thawed, in 3 containers: Amber glass with a Low-Density PolyEthylene (LDPE) eyedropper, and two types of LDPE bottles: one classical and one with an innovative insert that maintains sterility after opening (Novelia® from Nemera).

Methods: Three batches of 1% VED (10 mL) were aseptically compounded from marketed injectable voriconazole (Vfend®) diluted in sterile water for injection. VEDs were stored for three months at -20 °C in amber glass (n = 32), classical LDPE (n = 32) or innovative LDPE (n = 31) bottles. Stability-indicating (HPLC-UV-DAD) and chiral chromatography methods were developed. The stability study was conducted according to GERPAC-SFPC guidelines. At each study time, the following parameters were controlled: visual aspect, voriconazole concentration, pH and osmolality. In addition, non-visible particle count, sterility and absence of racemisation (impurity D - (2S,3R)-voriconazole) were assessed at the beginning and end of the study. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric tests (α < 5%) to compare containers.

Results: When stored frozen, concentration was between 95.2 ± 1.4% and 103.6 ± 1.3% of the initial concentration (C0) with no difference between the three containers (p = 0.564; non-significant). Fifteen days after thawing, concentration was between 97.1 ± 1.6% and 98.6 ± 0.8% of C0 with no difference between containers (p = 0.278 and 0.368 for VED thawed at room temperature and at 2-8 °C, respectively). pH remained stable between each time. Osmolality was slightly higher in glass (533.17 ± 8.93 mOsm/Kg) than in plastic containers (522.17±3.31mOsm/Kg, classical LDPE; 517.5 ± 12.42 mOsm/Kg, innovative LDPE) (p = 0.022). Sterility was preserved. Degradation product areas increased slightly but remained below the limit of quantification. Impurity D was never detected.

Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the ability of the innovative container Novelia® to maintain VED physicochemical and microbiological stability does not differ from that of amber glass and classical LDPE containers. Real life studies are required to find out if there is a potential difference between Novelia® and other containers in terms of sterility preservation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.105102DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

amber glass
12
classical ldpe
12
voriconazole eye-drops
8
stored frozen
8
innovative ldpe
8
containers
7
ldpe
7
glass
5
innovative
5
stability
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!