A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Candida auris: Clinical profile, diagnostic challenge and susceptibility pattern: Experience from a tertiary-care centre in South India. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant yeast that often goes misidentified by standard laboratory methods, prompting the need for improved identification techniques.
  • A study evaluated three identification methods (VITEK® MS v.3.0, VITEK®2, and sequencing) on 11 difficult-to-identify Candida isolates, revealing that traditional systems often fail to detect C. auris accurately.
  • Antifungal susceptibility testing showed a high resistance rate (91%) to fluconazole among the isolates, with sequencing confirmed as the most reliable approach for identifying C. auris in clinical settings.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Candida auris is an emerging, multidrug-resistant yeast transmitted in healthcare settings. Conventional methods of speciation are unable to identify C. auris to species level. Three methods, namely VITEK® MS v.3.0, VITEK®2 and target sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and 28S rRNA gene, were evaluated. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) was also performed, and risk factors for acquisition of C. auris candidaemia were studied.

Methods: Between November 2016 and November 2017, 203 Candida spp. were isolated from blood cultures, of which 11 isolates that were unidentifiable by conventional methods were further tested by VITEK® MS v.3.0 and VITEK®2 and were confirmed by sequencing. AFST was carried out on all 11 isolates by broth microdilution according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Clinical and epidemiological data of all patients retrieved from electronic patient records were reviewed.

Results: Of the 11 isolates identified as C. auris both by ITS and 28S rRNA sequencing, VITEK®2 identified only 5 as C. auris and VITEK® MS v.3.0 was not able to identify any of them as C. auris. Ten isolates (91%) were resistant to fluconazole, whereas all isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B and caspofungin.

Conclusion: Candida auris can be misidentified in routine microbiology laboratories. Sequencing remains the gold standard if commercial identification systems are not updated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2019.10.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

candida auris
12
vitek® v30
12
conventional methods
8
identify auris
8
v30 vitek®2
8
28s rrna
8
identified auris
8
auris
7
isolates
5
candida
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!