Background: In vitro fertilization is an important therapy for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The use of new ways of improving clinical results is yet required.

Objective: This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of progesterone primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and compare with conventional antagonist protocol in PCOS.

Materials And Methods: A total of 120 PCOS women who were candidates for assisted reproductive technology treatment from August to January 2019 were enrolled in this RCT and were placed into two groups, randomly (n= 60/each). The PPOS group received 20 mg /day Dydrogesterone orally since the second day of the cycle and the control group received antagonist protocol. The pregnancy outcomes including the chemical and clinical pregnancy, the miscarriage rate, and the percent of gestational sacs/ transferred embryos was compared in two groups.

Results: Number of MII oocyte, maturity rate, Number of 2 pronuclei (2PN) and serum estradiol levels on trigger day were statistically lower in PPOS group (p = 0.019, p = 0.035, p = 0.032, p = 0.030), respectively. Serum LH level on trigger day in PPOS group was higher than antagonist group (p = 0.005). Although there wasn't sever ovarian hyper simulation syndrome in any participants, mild and moderate ovarian hyper simulation syndrome was less in PPOS group (p = 0.001). Also, the chemical and clinical pregnancy rate were higher in the antagonist group, althoughit was not statistically significant (p = 0.136, p = 0.093 respectively).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrate that PPOS does not improve chemical and clinical pregnancy rate of the infertile women with PCOS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804324PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5103DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ppos group
16
chemical clinical
12
clinical pregnancy
12
ovarian stimulation
8
polycystic ovarian
8
ovarian syndrome
8
antagonist protocol
8
group received
8
trigger day
8
higher antagonist
8

Similar Publications

Background: Patient-centered care is becoming a paradigm in medicine. The Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) is the only tool that measures the patient-centered attitude of healthcare students and professionals. Despite its spread, PPOS has had a poor process of scale modelling and validation and previous studies raised concerns about its psychometric robustness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Question: Are live birth rates (LBRs) per woman following flexible progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (fPPOS) treatment non-inferior to LBRs per woman following the conventional GnRH-antagonist protocol in expected suboptimal responders undergoing freeze-all cycles in assisted reproduction treatment?

Summary Answer: In women expected to have a suboptimal response, the 12-month likelihood of live birth with the fPPOS treatment did not achieve the non-inferiority criteria when compared to the standard GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI treatment with a freeze-all strategy.

What Is Known Already: The standard PPOS protocol is effective for ovarian stimulation, where medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is conventionally administered in the early follicular phase for ovulatory suppression. Recent retrospective cohort studies on donor cycles have shown the potential to prevent premature ovulation and maintain oocyte yields by delaying the administration of MPA until the midcycle (referred to as fPPOS), similar to GnRH antagonist injections.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This was an original article, mainly explored the effects of the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) time on pregnancy outcomes after progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) regimen. Our study implemented a retrospective analysis of 315 infertile patients who underwent in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment from January 2021 to June 2023. Patients were divided into three groups based on their first FET time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of PPOS and CPOS in high-responder patients undergoing COS for IVF.

Methods: This one-year prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 86 high-responder patients. They were divided into PPOS (n=44) and CPOS (n=42).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) can guide decisions for immunotherapy treatment beyond progression.

Eur J Cancer

January 2025

Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany.

Background: Treatment beyond progression (TBP) is common in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), however, there is no biomarker to select patients that are more likely to derive benefit from TBP. Here, we investigated the potential of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) as a predictive biomarker to select patients for TBP.

Methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the immunotherapy arms in the randomized phase 3 trials IMmotion151 (renal cell carcinoma), OAK (non-small cell lung cancer) and IMvigor211 (urothelial cancer).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!