A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Does Moxa Smoke Have Significant Effect on the Acupuncturist's Respiratory System? A Population-Based Study. | LitMetric

Objectives: To evaluate the safety of moxa smoke, especially to provide quantitative information and details for the occupational prevention of acupuncturists.

Methods: We combined the questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey and lung function testing-based historical retrospective cohort research to investigate the safety of moxa smoke exposure (MSE) among acupuncturists. A mathematical regression model was established to quantitatively evaluate the relationship between moxa smoke exposure and the respiratory health of the acupuncturist. The smoke exposure time of the acupuncturist and the prevalence of abnormal respiratory symptoms or diseases were also evaluated.

Results: (1) The cross-sectional research showed that the incidence of expectoration (18.7%) and rhinitis (22.7%) was the most common respiratory symptom and disease after MSE. No statistical difference was found between smoke exposure time of the acupuncturist and the prevalence of abnormal respiratory symptoms or diseases, except the prevalence of rhinitis and shortness of breath ( < 0.01). Regression model for the incidence of first three symptoms (expectoration, shortness of breath, and wheezing) from the cross-sectional survey indicated that the weight coefficients of factors associated with moxa smoke were lower than those of factors unrelated to moxa smoke, such as gender and personal history of respiratory diseases. (2) Historical retrospective cohort research showed that there was no significant difference in the % predicted PEF. No statistic difference was found between the exposed and nonexposed group in large airway function indexes (% predicted FEV, % predicted FVC, and % predicted FEV/FVC) and small airway function indexes (% predicted FEF, % predicted FEF, % predicted FEF, and % predicted MMEF), either. Especially, the % predicted MVV among males (106.23 ± 2.92 vs. 95.56 ± 1.92, < 0.01 and % predicted VC among females (100.70 ± 1.59 vs. 95.91 ± 1.61, < 0.05) between the two groups had statistical significance, but did not cause pulmonary ventilation dysfunction.

Conclusions: MSE has no significant effect on the respiratory health of acupuncturists.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766099PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4873235DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moxa smoke
24
smoke exposure
16
predicted fef
12
fef predicted
12
predicted
10
safety moxa
8
cross-sectional survey
8
historical retrospective
8
retrospective cohort
8
regression model
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!