Long-term Outcomes in Down Syndrome Children After Cochlear Implantation: Particular Issues and Considerations.

Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze the long-term outcomes after cochlear implantation in deaf children with Down syndrome (DS) regarding age at the first implantation and refer the results to preoperative radiological findings as well as postoperative auditory and speech performance. Additionally, the influence of the age at implantation and duration of CI use on postoperative hearing and language skills were closely analyzed in children with DS.

Study Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Referral center (Cochlear Implant Center).

Materials And Methods: Nine children with Down syndrome were compared with 220 pediatric patients without additional mental disorders or genetic mutations. Patients were divided into four categories depending on the age of the first implantation: CAT1 (0-3 yr), CAT2 (4-5 yr), CAT3 (6-7 yr), and CAT4 (8-17 yr). The auditory performance was assessed with the meaningful auditory integration scales (MAIS) and categories of auditory performance (CAP) scales. The speech and language development were further evaluated with meaningful use of speech scale (MUSS) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR). The postoperative speech skills were analyzed and compared between the study group and the reference group by using nonparametric statistical tests. Anatomic abnormalities of the inner ear were examined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bones (HRCT).

Results: The mean follow-up time was 14.9 years (range, 13.1-18.3 yr). Patients with DS received a multichannel implant at a mean age of 75.3 months (SD 27.9; ranging from 21 to 127 mo) and 220 non-syndromic children from reference group at a mean age of 51.4 months (SD 34.2; ranging from 9 to 167 mo). The intraoperative neural response was present in all cases. The auditory and speech performance improved in each DS child. The postoperative mean CAP and SIR scores were 4.4 (SD 0.8) and 3.2 (SD 0.6), respectively. The average of scores in MUSS and MAIS/IT-MAIS scales was 59.8% (SD 0.1) and 76.9% (SD 0.1), respectively. Gathered data indicates that children with DS implanted with CI at a younger age (<6 years of age) benefited from the CI more than children implanted later in life, similarly in a control group. There were additional anomalies of the temporal bone, external, middle, or inner ear observed in 90% of DS children, basing on MRI or HRCT.

Conclusions: The early cochlear implantation in children with DS is a similarly useful method in treating severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) as in non-syndromic patients, although the development of speech skills present differently. Due to a higher prevalence of ear and temporal bone malformations, detailed diagnostic imaging should be taken into account before the CI qualification. Better postoperative outcomes may be achieved through comprehensive care from parents/guardians and speech therapists thanks to intensive and systematic rehabilitation.