Purpose: This novel arthroscopic subscapular sling procedure stabilizes the shoulder using a semitendinosus graft to create a sling around the subscapular tendon, which provides both static and dynamic stability. The aim of the study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of the subscapular sling procedure in human cadaveric shoulders. The hypothesis was that the sling offers an equal stabilizing effect and range of motion compared to an arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Methods: Sixteen shoulders were investigated using an industrial robot-based testing platform and four different conditions: the physiologically intact shoulder, after creating a Bankart lesion, after arthroscopic Bankart repair, and finally after applying the subscapular sling procedure using a semitendinosus tendon graft. Joint translation and external rotation were evaluated for each condition.
Results: The results show improved stability in the shoulders with the subscapular sling. The robot testing revealed a significant reduction in translation in anterior and anterior-inferior directions compared to the arthroscopic Bankart repair. None of the shoulders were dislocated by forced manual abduction and external rotation. No difficulties were encountered in performing the arthroscopic subscapular sling procedure. Thorough postoperative anatomical dissection showed no alterations to structures at risk.
Conclusion: The biomechanical results show increased stability with the use of the subscapular sling method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05737-3 | DOI Listing |
J Exp Orthop
July 2024
Department of Research and Innovation Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust Ålesund Norway.
Purpose: Recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability (RASI) is commonly treated with arthroscopic techniques, though their effectiveness in providing stability may diminish in cases of critical glenoid bone loss. This study aimed to compare the stability outcomes and range of motion (ROM) associated with an arthroscopic subscapular sling procedure (SSP), first introduced in 2015.
Methods: Sixteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulder specimens were biomechanically evaluated in four conditions: native, injured, post-SSP and post-LP.
Anterior shoulder instability is common. Cases of mild glenoid bone loss are typically addressed with conventional arthroscopic Bankart repair procedures, whereas more critical glenoid bone loss often necessitates more invasive, bone-blocking procedures. Recently, for cases that fall between the need for arthroscopic repair and open procedures, surgeons have developed methods for using soft tissue grafts to create a "sling" effect and augment glenoid labral repair.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthroscopy
October 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital and Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway.
Purpose: To analyze the results of the subscapular sling procedure developed for anterior shoulder instability in patients with less than 10% anterior glenoid bone loss.
Methods: Patients were treated surgically with the arthroscopic subscapular sling procedure. A semitendinosus graft was used to reconstruct the anterior labrum and to establish a sling suspension around the upper part of the subscapularis tendon.
Orthop Surg
March 2024
ORTOPEDICUM-Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Clinic, Romanian Shoulder Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
Background: Numerous studies indicate that glenoid bony augmentation raises the risk of complications during and after surgery. On the other hand, repairing the labrum alone in cases with subcritical glenoid bone loss results in recurrent instability and persistent apprehension. As a result, recent advancements in shoulder instability surgery prioritize fully restoring the anterior shoulder restraint.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthrosc Tech
May 2022
Department of Orthopedics, Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University (the 73th Group Military Hospital of People's Liberation Army), Xiamen, Fujian, China.
The limitations of transferring the coracoid process along with the conjoined tendon are coracoacromial arch damage, technical difficulty, and nerve injury. The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) proximal transposition technique has a weaker sling effect and a risk of nerve injury. The arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation technique may have risks of shoulder external rotation restriction and subscapularis transection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!