A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Environmental assessments of biological treatments of biowaste in life cycle perspective: A critical review. | LitMetric

Environmental assessments of biological treatments of biowaste in life cycle perspective: A critical review.

Waste Manag Res

Centre of Engineering, Modelling and Applied Social Sciences, Environmental Science and Technology Graduate Program, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, Brazil.

Published: December 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • Municipal biowaste is a significant environmental concern, and life-cycle assessments help evaluate recycling methods like anaerobic digestion and composting, but there are inconsistencies in the findings across different studies.
  • Reviews highlighted methodological shortcomings, particularly in how studies defined system boundaries and accounted for energy sources and carbon sequestration.
  • The analysis emphasizes the need for more comprehensive research on the benefits of compost use, as well as better integration of emissions compensation from synthetic fertilizers and different methodological approaches in future studies.

Article Abstract

Municipal biowaste is a major environmental issue. Life-cycle assessment is a valuable tool to assess recycling options, and anaerobic digestion and composting have performed adequately. However, reviews indicate several discrepancies between studies. Thus, we critically review 25 life-cycle assessments of the composting and anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste. Our objective is to identify decisive factors, methodological gaps and processes that affect environmental performance. We generally identified methodological gaps in expanding systems borders. In energy systems, the replaced energy source did not consider power generation or dynamic regulation. All studies adopted mixed energy sources or marginal approaches. Agroecosystems included the carbon sequestration potential and compensation for the production of synthetic fertilizers only. A limited range of scientifically proven benefits of compost use has been reported. In general, studies provided a limited account of the effects of use on land emissions, but contradictory assumptions emerged, mainly in modelling synthetic fertilizer compensation. Only three studies compensated direct emissions from the use of synthetic fertilizers, and none included indirect emissions. Further studies should include an analysis of the additional benefits of compost use, compensate for the effects of emissions from synthetic fertilizer use on land and mix attributional and consequential approaches in energy system expansion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19879222DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

municipal biowaste
8
anaerobic digestion
8
methodological gaps
8
synthetic fertilizers
8
benefits compost
8
synthetic fertilizer
8
emissions synthetic
8
studies
5
environmental assessments
4
assessments biological
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!