Background: The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cetuximab (PFC) is the reference first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We analysed whether treatment intensification by the addition of docetaxel to PFC improved efficacy in R/M SCCHN.

Methods: A total of 180 patients with R/M SCCHN (1:1) were assigned to receive either cisplatin (40 mg/m), docetaxel (40 mg/m) and 5-FU (2000 mg/m) at days 1 and 8 and cetuximab (400/250 mg/m) at days 1, 8 and 15 (DPFC) or standard cisplatin (100 mg/m) at day 1, 5-FU (1000 mg/m) at days 1-4 and cetuximab (400/250 mg/m) at days 1, 8 and 15 (PFC). Chemotherapy was repeated every 21 days and continued for a maximum of 6 cycles in absence of disease progression or limiting toxicity, followed by cetuximab maintenance (500 mg/m every 2 weeks). The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: A preplanned interim analysis for toxicity after 20 patients/arm revealed excessive grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal (65%) and infectious toxicities (35%) in arm A, which led to dose reduction of cisplatin to 30 mg/m and 5-FU to 1000 mg/m for subsequent patients. With a median follow-up of 2 years, grade 4 toxicities were 21.3% vs. 30.8% for DPFC and PFC, respectively. More treatment-related deaths occurred with DPFC vs. PFC, with 11.2% and 6.6%, respectively. For DPFC and PFC, the median PFS was 6.3 vs. 6.4 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.97, p = 0.87), the median overall survival was 8.9 vs. 10.6 months (HR = 1.29 p = 0.1) and response rates were 38.2% vs. 31.9% (p = 0.9), respectively.

Conclusions: DPFC failed to improve efficacy in R/M SCCHN. On the contrary, a high toxicity and mortality rate was detected in both arms, which underscores the vulnerability of patients with R/M SCCHN, and research on the need for further optimisation of the front-line chemotherapy backbone is ongoing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

r/m scchn
12
dpfc pfc
12
squamous cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
carcinoma head
8
head neck
8
efficacy r/m
8
patients r/m
8
cetuximab 400/250 mg/m
8
400/250 mg/m days
8

Similar Publications

Background/aim: The predictive role of hematological markers in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with pembrolizumab remains unclear.

Patients And Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to investigate the predictive impact of the pre-treatment hematological markers neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index, and the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with R/M SCCHN treated with pembrolizumab. From December 2019 to February 2022, 119 and 28 patients were treated with pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) platinum-refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have fewer treatment options and harbor an especially poor prognosis. Maintaining treatment with anti-PD1 agents beyond response evaluation criteria in solid tumors-defined disease progression (TBP) has been shown to be efficacious in several solid tumors, including head and neck cancer. We present the case of a platinum-refractory locally recurrent, PD-L1-negative hypopharyngeal carcinoma, that received second-line nivolumab which was then maintained beyond progression under the following criteria: no Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status deterioration, no rapidly progressive disease, no severe toxicity, and evidence of overall treatment benefit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the CheckMate 651 study, nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME (cisplatin/carboplatin + cetuximab + fluorouracil) regimen was compared for effectiveness. It is not known whether these immunotherapy agents are cost-effective for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with EXTREME in the first-line setting from the standpoint of third-party payers in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like nivolumab and pembrolizumab are effective treatments for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). However, they can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. We present a case of a 79-year-old male with recurrent maxillary squamous cell carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential in treating recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). However, the overall response rate (ORR) is limited to 10-20%, and subsequent chemotherapy is critical to maximizing the subjects' prognosis.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients with R/M SCCHN treated with paclitaxel+cetuximab (PE)-based chemotherapy (PCE, paclitaxel+carboplatin+cetuximab; or PTX+Cmab, paclitaxel+cetuximab) following disease progression after either pembrolizumab or nivolumab monotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!