Perspectives on Mobile Health Versus Clinic-Based Group Interventions for People With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Qualitative Study.

Psychiatr Serv

Department of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire (Carpenter-Song); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago (Jonathan); Behavioral Research in Technology and Engineering (BRiTE) Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Brian, Ben-Zeev).

Published: January 2020

Objective: This study built on research comparing a mobile health intervention (FOCUS) and a clinic-based intervention (Wellness Recovery Action Planning [WRAP]) for self-management of serious mental illnesses. Qualitative interviews were conducted to provide additional insight into engagement and satisfaction and augment understanding of clinical outcomes.

Methods: Individuals (N=31) with serious mental illness participating in a comparative effectiveness trial were interviewed. Interviewees were sampled purposively for a range of engagement with the interventions. Interviews inquired into experiences with the interventions and were 45-60 minutes long, audio recorded, and transcribed. Researchers developed qualitative codes based on the research aims, interview domains, and inductively derived categories, aggregating data by code and producing analytic memos to distill main findings.

Results: Both FOCUS and WRAP participants described gaining new information about mental illness and new skills for managing symptoms. FOCUS participants emphasized the intervention's accessibility, and WRAP participants highlighted the importance of community and shared experiences. FOCUS participants commenced treatment at higher rates, compared with WRAP participants, which may have been related to the strongly negative views of group interventions expressed by some WRAP participants. FOCUS was generally enthusiastically received. The comparable clinical outcomes of the interventions were reflected in narratives detailing the positive impact of the interventions.

Conclusions: Interviews provided evidence that mobile health and clinic-based illness self-management interventions were well received and offered opportunities to learn new illness management skills. Findings support expanding the range of services and supports for persons with serious mental illness to include traditional and technology-based approaches.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201900110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

serious mental
16
wrap participants
16
mobile health
12
mental illness
12
group interventions
8
mental illnesses
8
illnesses qualitative
8
focus participants
8
interventions
6
participants
6

Similar Publications

There are serious concerns about mental health on college campuses. Depression negatively impacts college student success. Women and transgender/gender-nonconforming students suffer from depression at higher rates than men.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Use of Bibliotherapy for Depression in Pediatric Cancer Patients.

Psychiatr Hung

January 2025

Divisions of Pediatric Neurology and Genetics and Behavioral-Developmental Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram, Konya, Türkiye, E-mail:

In this article, we discuss the use of bibliotherapy for depression in pediatric cancer patients, to attract attention to the importance of this method, overlooked by most health professionals. Cancer in children and adolescents is one of the most serious health problems worldwide. There is a subgroup of children with cancer at increased risk for anxiety and depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prevention of depression, stress, and anxiety is a serious concern of the World Health Organization and has been a research topic over the last decades. There is a close association found between children's mental health problems and parental stress, valid for biological and foster families. Evidence suggests that parents with children with disabilities are more stressed, depressed, or anxious than parents who do not have such children.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effectiveness of a stepped-care programme of WHO psychological interventions in a population of migrants: results from the RESPOND randomized controlled trial.

World Psychiatry

February 2025

WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Migrant populations - including labour migrants, undocumented migrants, asylum seekers, refugees, internationally displaced persons, and other populations on the move - are exposed to a variety of stressors that affect their mental health. We designed and tested the effectiveness of a stepped-care programme consisting of two scalable psychological interventions developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and locally adapted for migrant populations. A parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted in Italy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Feeding and eating disorders (FEDs) are a heterogeneous grouping of disorders at the mind-body interface, with typical onset from childhood into emerging adulthood. They occur along a spectrum of disordered eating and compensatory weight management behaviors, and from low to high body weight. Psychiatric comorbidities are the norm.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!