Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in the identification of developmental and behavioral concerns in children are public health problems in the United States. Early identification of developmental delay using validated screening instruments provides a pathway to prevention and intervention in pediatric health care settings. However, the validity of Spanish-language screening instruments, used in clinical settings in the United States, has not been systematically examined.

Objective: This study aims to review the literature of clinically administered developmental and behavioral instruments with Hispanic caregivers to investigate implementation variation due to language and cultural factors.

Methods: A systematic literature review using PubMed and PsycINFO was conducted of articles published from January 1, 2006 to December 12, 2017. Abstract, full-text, and critical appraisal resulted in 11 studies that met criteria for inclusion.

Results: Five different instruments were used to screen Hispanic or Spanish-speaking caregivers of children younger than 6 years. None of the instruments established validity and reliability apart from Spanish translation. Two studies identified differences in screening results with Spanish-speaking caregivers due to language and 6 described cultural differences that impacted screening implementation. Two studies reported differential item functioning in Spanish-translated instruments.

Conclusions: Language and cultural considerations are critical to the administration of valid and reliable screening in pediatric health care settings. Available developmental and behavioral Spanish-language-screening instruments function differently because of both language and culture, suggesting the tools are not as psychometrically valid when administered to Spanish-speaking families. Validation of translated screening instruments is essential to eliminate the possibility of detection bias or misidentification of developmental risk, improving early access to clinical services for Hispanic and Spanish-speaking families.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000724DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening instruments
16
developmental behavioral
16
united states
12
behavioral concerns
8
systematic literature
8
literature review
8
identification developmental
8
pediatric health
8
health care
8
care settings
8

Similar Publications

Prehospital Interventions to Reduce Discomfort From Spinal Immobilization in Adult Trauma Patients: A Scoping Review.

J Trauma Nurs

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Dr Mota); Health School, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu, Portugal (Drs Mota, Santos, and Cunha); Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Coimbra, Portugal (Drs Mota and Cunha); CINTESIS@RISE - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Drs Mota and Santos); Academic Clinical Centre of Beiras, Covilhã, Portugal (Drs Mota and Cunha); Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Drs Melo and Santos); Portugal Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Coimbra, Portugal (Dr Santos); Hospital São Teotónio, Tondela Viseu Hospital Centre, Viseu, Portugal (Dr Abrantes); Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Seia, Seia, Portugal (Dr Monteiro); and Nursing School of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Dr Santos).

Background: Spinal immobilization, a widely used trauma prehospital intervention, is known to cause discomfort, yet little is known about interventions to reduce this discomfort.

Objective: This scoping review aims to evaluate prehospital interventions to reduce discomfort from spinal immobilization in adult trauma patients.

Method: This scoping review assessed prehospital pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to address discomfort from spinal immobilization in adult trauma patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Fragility fractures result in significant morbidity.

Objective: To review evidence on osteoporosis screening to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and trial registries through January 9, 2024; references, experts, and literature surveillance through July 31, 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient-reported outcomes of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review and future directions.

J Patient Rep Outcomes

January 2025

Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Purpose: Zirconia dental implants show excellent biocompatibility and tissue integration, low affinity for plaque, and favorable biomechanical properties. However, these objective measures do not adequately replicate the patient's perception. This systematic review evaluated the evidence on patient-reported outcome (PROs) in zirconia dental implant treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Compared with previous decades, healthcare has emerged as a key global concern in light of the recurrent outbreak of pandemics. The initial stage in the provision of healthcare involves the process of diagnosis. Countries worldwide advocate for healthcare research due to its efficacy and capacity to assist diverse populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Delayed metal hypersensitivity reactions can cause complications in spine surgery. Currently, there is no information on the prevalence of metal hypersensitivity in pediatric patients undergoing spine surgery. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of metal hypersensitivity in pediatric patients undergoing spinal instrumentation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!