Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking.

J Med Libr Assoc

Vice President for Knowledge Management; Professor, Department of Biomedical Informatics; Professor, Department of Medicine; and Director, Center for Knowledge Management, Strategy and Innovation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN,

Published: October 2019

All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of topic investigation searches that are requested of information professionals is critical to both meeting requestors' needs and reflecting their intended methodological approaches. Information professionals' expertise can be an invaluable resource to guide users through the investigative and publication process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774532PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

equating evidence
4
evidence searches
4
searches systematic
4
systematic reviews
4
reviews defies
4
defies role
4
role seeking
4
seeking quality
4
quality rigor
4
rigor topic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!