A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Mechanisms of NMDA receptor inhibition by diarylamidine compounds. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effects of three antiprotozoal compounds (pentamidine, diminazene, and DAPI) on NMDA receptors in rat brain cells.
  • All three compounds were found to inhibit NMDA receptor activity at specific concentrations, with distinct voltage dependencies in their actions.
  • The differences in how these compounds interact with the NMDA receptors are attributed to their unique 3D structures, affecting their ability to be trapped in the receptor channels.

Article Abstract

Pentamidine, diminazene and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) are antiprotozoal diarylamidine compounds. In the present work, we have studied their action on native N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons. All three compounds inhibited NMDA receptors at -80 mV holding voltage with IC of 0.41 ± 0.08, 13 ± 3 and 3.1 ± 0.6 μM, respectively. The inhibition by pentamidine was strongly voltage-dependent, while that of DAPI was practically voltage-independent. Inhibition by diminazene had both voltage-dependent and voltage-independent components. Diminazene and DAPI demonstrated tail currents and overshoots suggesting "foot-in-the-door" mechanism of action. In contrast, pentamidine was partially trapped in the closed NMDA receptor channels. Such difference in the mechanism of action can be explained by the difference in the 3D structure of compounds. In the pentamidine molecule, two benzamidine groups are connected with a flexible linker, which allows the molecule to fold up and fit in the cavity of a closed NMDA receptor channel. Diminazene and DAPI, in contrast, have an extended form and could not be trapped.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14589DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nmda receptor
12
diarylamidine compounds
8
compounds pentamidine
8
nmda receptors
8
diminazene dapi
8
mechanism action
8
closed nmda
8
mechanisms nmda
4
receptor inhibition
4
inhibition diarylamidine
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!