Objective classification of psychomotor laparoscopic skills of surgeons based on three different approaches.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg

Department of Electrical Engineering, Bioelectronics Section, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Av. IPN 2508, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico.

Published: January 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Surgeons' psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery are crucial indicators of training effectiveness, leading to the need for objective assessment methods.
  • Study involved 43 participants categorized by experience, using a simulator to analyze instrument motion data through 13 parameters.
  • The K-star classification method outperformed others with high accuracy rates in classifying surgical competence based on psychomotor skills, supporting its potential for training evaluation.

Article Abstract

Background: The determination of surgeons' psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery techniques is one of the major concerns of the programs of surgical training in several hospitals. Therefore, it is important to assess and classify objectively the level of experience of surgeons and residents during their training process. The aim of this study was to investigate three classification methods for establishing automatically the level of surgical competence of the surgeons based on their psychomotor laparoscopic skills.

Methods: A total of 43 participants, divided into an experienced surgeons group with ten experts (> 100 laparoscopic procedures performed) and non-experienced surgeons group with 24 residents and nine medical students (< 10 laparoscopic procedures performed), performed three tasks in the EndoViS training system. Motion data of the instruments were captured with a video-tracking system built into the EndoViS simulator and analyzed using 13 motion analysis parameters (MAPs). Radial basis function networks (RBFNets), K-star (K*), and random forest (RF) were used for classifying surgeons based on the MAPs' scores of all participants. The performance of the three classifiers was examined using hold-out and leave-one-out validation techniques.

Results: For all three tasks, the K-star method was superior in terms of accuracy and AUC in both validation techniques. The mean accuracy of the classifiers was 93.33% for K-star, 87.58% for RBFNets, and 84.85% for RF in hold-out validation, and 91.47% for K-star, 89.92% for RBFNets, and 83.72% for RF in leave-one-out cross-validation.

Conclusions: The three proposed methods demonstrated high performance in the classification of laparoscopic surgeons, according to their level of psychomotor skills. Together with motion analysis and three laparoscopic tasks of the Fundamental Laparoscopic Surgery Program, these classifiers provide a means for objectively classifying surgical competence of the surgeons for existing laparoscopic box trainers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-02073-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychomotor laparoscopic
8
surgeons based
8
surgeons group
8
surgeons
5
objective classification
4
classification psychomotor
4
laparoscopic skills
4
skills surgeons
4
based three
4
three approaches
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!