A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy and placebo response of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for primary insomnia. | LitMetric

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been considered a promising technique for the treatment of primary insomnia. However, its efficacy and placebo response remains unclear due to limited clinical data. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the efficacy and placebo response of rTMS.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search for clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of rTMS addressing primary insomnia. To pool effect size estimates (Hedges' g) of active rTMS and sham rTMS across studies for outcome measures, a meta-analysis was done according to the Cochrane guideline.

Results: In sum, rTMS significantly improved insomnia symptoms in the active rTMS group, and the pooled effect size of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was -0.98 (95% CI: -1.28, -0.68) for treatment duration of 10 days, -1.16 (95% CI: -1.51, -0.82) for 20 days, and -2.14 (95% CI: -2.45, -1.83) for 30 days, respectively. However, the placebo response was also significant, reducing insomnia symptoms in the sham rTMS group. Furthermore, 73.5% (95% CI: 50.8%, 96.2%) of the effect size of active rTMS was actually produced by sham rTMS.

Conclusion: The rTMS was effective in the treatment of primary insomnia, yet, the placebo effect of sham stimulation was highly significant. This new evidence may alter rTMS regimen for insomnia from a clinical and methodological point of view. Finally, in future research more objective data and multicenter double-blinded controlled studies should be encouraged.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2019.05.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

placebo response
16
primary insomnia
16
efficacy placebo
12
active rtms
12
rtms
10
repetitive transcranial
8
transcranial magnetic
8
magnetic stimulation
8
treatment primary
8
sham rtms
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!