Government funding and policies are critical to academic medicine. Publicfunds sustain the education, research, and patient care missions of medical schools and teaching hospitals, and regulations govern the fulfillment of those missions. Consequently, both individuals and institutions often need to engage with those who develop these policies, including through lobbying. Lobbying fulfills a constitutionally protected right to petition the government for a redress of grievances, despite perceptions that it is instead only back-room dealing and insider influence. As an important part of the system of government in the United States, lobbying is subject to complex regulations, and failure to comply can result in substantial penalties, particularly for tax-exempt entities, of which almost all medical schools and the large majority of teaching hospitals are. In this Invited Commentary, the author briefly summarizes these regulations to complement the article in this issue by Lynch and colleagues. He then argues that while regulatory compliance is essential, it is not the same as lobbying effectively. For individual academic researchers to do that involves a number of considerations, including whether to coordinate their efforts with those of their institution to leverage the expertise and resources of the institution, to maximize their chances for success with policymakers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003036 | DOI Listing |
NASN Sch Nurse
January 2025
Department Head Department of Human Development and Family Sciences at Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA.
Nurse rounds have long been an established practice in clinical settings, resulting in improved patient care through accurate assessment, evaluation, and communication. This practice has also been shown to create seamless patient-centered care among the medical team, the patient, and their family members. While nurse rounds are an important component of clinical care, school nurses have not adopted this practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Educ
January 2025
University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware Street SE, Mayo Building, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Background: A common practice in assessment development, fundamental for fairness and consequently the validity of test score interpretations and uses, is to ascertain whether test items function equally across test-taker groups. Accordingly, we conducted differential item functioning (DIF) analysis, a psychometric procedure for detecting potential item bias, for three preclinical medical school foundational courses based on students' sex and race.
Methods: The sample included 520, 519, and 344 medical students for anatomy, histology, and physiology, respectively, collected from 2018 to 2020.
Arch Dis Child
January 2025
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Background: The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among Chinese adolescents has continued to increase in recent years. Adolescents with IBD interrupted their schooling due to the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. And when the condition stabilises, they will return to school.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRambam Maimonides Med J
January 2025
Clinical Professor of Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Family Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Introduction: Antisemitism and antisemitic incidents have been increasing in United States medical institutions since the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023. Such incidents include anecdotal reports of antisemitic displays at medical school commencements. This study examined unprofessional behavior observed at the commencement ceremonies of the 25 US medical schools top-ranked for research excellence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Paediatr
January 2025
Paediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aim: Young people with childhood-onset motor disabilities face unique challenges in understanding and managing their condition. This study explored how they learnt about their condition.
Method: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2023-2024 at a Swiss paediatric neurorehabilitation unit.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!