The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate and compare pre-, peri-, and post-operative data of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) patients undergoing native nephrectomy (NN) either before or after renal transplantation and 2) to identify advantages of optimal surgical timing, postoperative outcomes, and economical aspects in a tertiary transplant centre. This retrospective analysis included 121 patients divided into two groups-group 1: patients who underwent NN prior to receiving a kidney transplant ( = 89) and group 2: patients who underwent NN post-transplant ( = 32). Data analysis was performed according to demographic patient details, surgical indication, laboratory parameters, perioperative complications, underlying pathology, and associated mortality. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the groups, however right-sided nephrectomy was performed predominantly within group 1. The main indication in both groups undergoing a nephrectomy was pain. Patients among group 2 had no postoperative kidney failure and a significantly shorter hospital stay. Higher rates of more severe complications were observed in group 1, even though this was not statistically significant. Even though the differences between both groups were substantial, the time of NN prior or post-transplant does not seem to affect short-term and long-term transplantation outcomes. Retroperitoneal NN remains a low risk treatment option in patients with symptomatic ADPKD and can be performed either pre- or post-kidney transplantation depending on patients' symptom severity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6832478 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101622 | DOI Listing |
BJU Int
January 2025
Department of Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Objective: To explore patients' experience of decision making regarding treatment of localised kidney cancer.
Methods: A total of 21 patients with localised kidney cancer, across three countries, participated in either four focus groups or seven semi-structured interviews that lasted on average 2 h. Focus groups and interviews were all conducted in the participants' native language, recorded, transcribed and (if applicable) translated into English.
J Nephrol
November 2024
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int J Surg Case Rep
November 2024
Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Introduction And Importance: Renal transplant recipients have a higher risk for developing cancers compared to the general population due to high-dose immunosuppression. The risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in native kidneys is 7-fold greater than the general population and development of RCC in an allograft kidney is extremely rare. We report the diagnosis and management of a large RCC in an allograft renal transplant and metastatic disease in a regional lymph node.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Transplant
October 2024
University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Introduction: Although living kidney donation is generally considered a safe procedure, it is ethically critical that prospective donors are fully informed before consent. However, prospective donors lack a deep understanding of the donation experience, making the postdonation aftermath feel unanticipated. We sought to gain in-depth qualitative descriptions of the short- and long-term risks and benefits associated with kidney donation among an ethnically diverse group of donors to offer a balanced view of the positive and negative experiences that may occur postdonation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Urol Nephrol
October 2024
Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!