A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Timing of brain computed tomography and accuracy of outcome prediction after cardiac arrest. | LitMetric

Aim: Gray-white-matter ratio (GWR) calculated from head CT is a radiologic index of tissue changes associated with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest (CA). Evidence from previous studies indicates high specificity for poor outcome prediction at GWR thresholds of 1.10-1.20. We aimed to determine the relationship between accuracy of neurologic prognostication by GWR and timing of CT.

Methods: We included 195 patients admitted to the ICU following CA. GWR was calculated from CT radiologic densities in 16 regions of interest. Outcome was determined upon intensive care unit discharge using the cerebral performance category (CPC). Accuracy of outcome prediction of GWR was compared for 3 epochs (<6, 6-24, and >24 h after CA).

Results: 125 (64%) patients had poor (CPC4-5) and 70 (36%) good outcome (CPC1-3). Irrespective of timing, specificity for poor outcome prediction was 100% at a GWR threshold of 1.10. Among 50 patients with both early and late CT, GWR decreased significantly over time (p = 0.002) in patients with poor outcome, sensitivity for poor outcome prediction was 12% (7-20%) with early CTs (<6 h) and 48% (38-58%) for late CTs (>24 h). Across all patients, sensitivity of early and late CT was 17% (9-28%) and 39% (28-51%), respectively.

Conclusion: A GWR below 1.10 predicts poor outcome (CPC4-5) in patients after CA with high specificity irrespective of time of acquisition of CT. Because GWR decreases over time in patients with severe HIE, sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome is higher for late CTs (>24 h after CA) as compared to early CTs (<6 h after CA).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.09.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

poor outcome
24
outcome prediction
20
outcome
10
gwr
9
accuracy outcome
8
cardiac arrest
8
gwr calculated
8
high specificity
8
specificity poor
8
prediction gwr
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!