AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines how recruitability affects patient response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), proposing a bedside method for estimation.
  • A single-breath technique was validated to measure the recruited lung volume and distinguish between patients with high and low recruitment responses to PEEP.
  • Results indicated a strong correlation between recruited volume measurements and a recruitment-to-inflation ratio, which is linked to oxygenation levels, highlighting the approach's potential for clinical use.

Article Abstract

Response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome depends on recruitability. We propose a bedside approach to estimate recruitability accounting for the presence of complete airway closure. To validate a single-breath method for measuring recruited volume and test whether it differentiates patients with different responses to PEEP. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were ventilated at 15 and 5 cm HO of PEEP. Multiple pressure-volume curves were compared with a single-breath technique. Abruptly releasing PEEP (from 15 to 5 cm HO) increases expired volume: the difference between this volume and the volume predicted by compliance at low PEEP (or above airway opening pressure) estimated the recruited volume by PEEP. This recruited volume divided by the effective pressure change gave the compliance of the recruited lung; the ratio of this compliance to the compliance at low PEEP gave the recruitment-to-inflation ratio. Response to PEEP was compared between high and low recruiters based on this ratio. Forty-five patients were enrolled. Four patients had airway closure higher than high PEEP, and thus recruitment could not be assessed. In others, recruited volume measured by the experimental and the reference methods were strongly correlated ( = 0.798;  < 0.0001) with small bias (-21 ml). The recruitment-to-inflation ratio (median, 0.5; range, 0-2.0) correlated with both oxygenation at low PEEP and the oxygenation response; at PEEP 15, high recruiters had better oxygenation ( = 0.004), whereas low recruiters experienced lower systolic arterial pressure ( = 0.008). A single-breath method quantifies recruited volume. The recruitment-to-inflation ratio might help to characterize lung recruitability at the bedside.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02457741).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201902-0334OCDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

recruited volume
16
acute respiratory
12
respiratory distress
12
distress syndrome
12
peep
9
recruitment-to-inflation ratio
8
airway closure
8
compliance low
8
low peep
8
volume
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!