A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[The influence of different means of myopia correction on peripheral refraction depending on the direction of gaze]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Peripheral defocus plays a role in controlling the development of refraction, which is especially important for myopic individuals.
  • A study involving 128 patients aged 8-14 evaluated how different vision correction methods affect peripheral refraction in myopic eyes based on gaze direction.
  • Results revealed that while peripheral refraction measurements in contact lenses do not vary with gaze direction, glasses show significant differences, with orthokeratology lenses and perifocal glasses providing the most effective means to slow myopia progression.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral defocus was experimentally found to control the development of refraction.

Purpose: To evaluate peripheral refraction (PR) of myopic eyes in terms of different means of correction and the direction of gaze.

Material And Methods: The study examined 128 patients (256 eyes) aged 8-14 years (average 11.07±0.39 years) with myopia from -1.0 to -7.0 (average -3.57±0.27 D). PR was measured without correction, in perifocal (PF), monofocal (MF), progressive glasses (PAL), monofocal soft contact lenses (ΜCL) and after orthokeratological (OCL) correction with the gaze directed straightforward or head angled outward, inward, upward and downward; all measurements were performed using binocular open-field auto ref/keratometer.

Results: PR profile without correction and with contact (OCL, ΜCL) correction does not depend on the direction of the gaze. In glasses, peripheral defocus is different with straightforward and skewed gaze directions. OCL forms a significant myopic defocus throughout the periphery of the retina. When using MCL, hyperopic defocus increases in all zones except the extreme temporal. In MF glasses, hyperopic defocus is formed and enhanced in all areas, significantly greater with skewed gaze than with straightforward. In PALs, myopic defocus is formed with gaze directed upward and downward, as well as at the extreme temporal periphery of the retina with straightforward gaze. In all other zones, hypermetropic defocus increases. In PF, in most zones myopic defocus is formed with all gaze directions. The greatest inhibitory effect on myopia progression is provided by OCL (YPR=0.28 D/year) and PF glasses (YPR=0.26 D/year).

Conclusion: In contrast to correction with contact lenses, PR in glasses does depend on the direction of gaze. The inhibitory effect of the optics correlates with correction of hypermetropic defocus in myopic eyes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913504160DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

myopic defocus
12
defocus formed
12
defocus
9
correction
8
peripheral refraction
8
peripheral defocus
8
myopic eyes
8
contact lenses
8
gaze
8
gaze directed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!