Genotypic differences in CC224, CC363, CC449 and CC446 of Moraxella catarrhalis isolates based on whole genome SNP, MLST and PFGE typing.

Int J Med Microbiol

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, 100730, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Mechanisms Research and Precision Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases (BZ0447), 100730, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Published: January 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Understanding the evolution of macrolide resistance in M. catarrhalis is crucial to prevent its spread, and the effectiveness of typing methods (MLST, PFGE, WGST) in analyzing this organism was examined.
  • PFGE and WGST showed high agreement and consistency in identifying clones, while MLST was less effective for distinguishing between different clones.
  • The study identified macrolide-resistant strains within previously susceptible clonal complexes and highlighted the evolutionary link between these strains, their virulence potential, and specific genetic markers.

Article Abstract

Understanding the evolutionary path of M. catarrhalis from macrolide-susceptible to macrolide-resistant organism, is important for hindering macrolide resistance from propagation. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole genome SNP typing (WGST), as useful and practical typing tools, have both advantages and disadvantages. We studied the utility of these 3 typing methods, including the level of agreement, consistency and drawbacks, in characterizing M. catarrhalis clones and clonal complexes. We focused on four clonal complexes [CC224, CC363, CC449 (CCN10) and CC446 (CCN08)] and found that PFGE and WGST had a high level of agreement and a proper consistency of the same clone or very closely related clones, while MLST is less discriminatory for different clones. Furthermore, we also established an evolutionary distance cut-off value for "The same clone". Moreover, we detected macrolide-resistant M. catarrhalis in CC224, which had previously been considered as a macrolide-susceptible clonal complex. A higher number of isolates belonged to ST215 compared to ST446, implying that ST215 is more likely to be the primary founder. Our study also demonstrated that all the four clonal complexes belong to the M. catarrhalis lineage 1, which is considered to be related to increased virulence potential and serum resistance. We also observed that copB II was highly related to CC449 and LOS type B was mainly confined in CC224. In conclusion, these findings provide further insight into the evolutionary characteristics of M. catarrhalis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2019.151357DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clonal complexes
12
cc363 cc449
8
genome snp
8
level agreement
8
catarrhalis
6
typing
5
genotypic differences
4
differences cc224
4
cc224 cc363
4
cc449 cc446
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!