Switching from efavirenz to rilpivirine improves sleep quality and self-perceived cognition but has no impact on neurocognitive performances.

AIDS

SC Malattie Infettive, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza University of Milano-Bicocca Ospedale San Paolo, University of Milan, Milan Clinica di Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, ASST Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia Clinica di Malattie Infettive, Ospedale San Martino, Genoa Clinica di Malattie Infettive, University of Turin, Turin Clinica di Malattie Infettive, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Policinico di Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Published: January 2020

Background: Efavirenz (EFV) association with neurocognitive impairment is debated. Whether switching away from EFV improves neurocognitive performances is still controversial.

Methods: In a randomized open-label controlled trial, patients under effective treatment with tenofovir disoproxil-fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine (FTC) and EFV, who had altered neurocognitive assessment (z-transformed score below -1 in at least one cognitive domain), depression, anxiety or low sleep-quality, were randomized 1 : 1 to immediate or delayed (24-weeks) switch to TDF/FTC/rilpivirine (RPV). Treatment efficacy, neurocognitive function, symptoms and quality of life were evaluated 12, 24 and 48 weeks after randomization.

Findings: Seventy-four patients were randomized to immediate (36 patients) or delayed switch (38 patients). At baseline, 63 and 25% of patients had z-scores below -1 in at least one or two neurocognitive domains, 31.1, 17.6 and 44.6% had significant depression or anxiety symptoms or low sleep quality. At week 24 (primary end-point), overall neurocognitive improvement was observed, with no statistically significant differences between arms, neither considering the global z score (between arms difference +0.1; P = 0.458), nor domain-specific z scores. Patients switching away from EFV had significant greater improvement of sleep quality index (between-arm difference -1.5; P = 0.011), self-reported cognitive failures (-6.2; P = 0.001) and CNS symptoms score (-5; P = 0.002), but not of anxiety or depression. No protocol defined virological failure, grade at least 3 lab abnormalities or drug-related serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Our results do not support the hypothesis that switching to RPV improves cognitive function in patient under stable treatment with EFV. Nonetheless, improvements in neuropsychiatric symptoms, sleep quality and self-perceived cognition were observed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002377DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sleep quality
16
quality self-perceived
8
self-perceived cognition
8
neurocognitive performances
8
switching efv
8
depression anxiety
8
neurocognitive
7
patients
6
quality
5
efv
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!