AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients with rheumatoid diseases face a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related mortality due to both traditional risk factors and systemic inflammation.
  • This review looks at how synthetic, non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)—like methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine—might influence CVD risk, indicating that methotrexate has the strongest evidence for reducing CVD issues.
  • More comprehensive studies and clinical trials are necessary to explore the impact of these drugs on CVD outcomes, especially concerning heart failure, arrhythmias, and whether these drugs perform worse than biologic DMARDs in terms of CVD.

Article Abstract

Patients with rheumatoid diseases have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD-related death compared with the general population. Both the traditional cardiovascular risk factors and systemic inflammation are contributors to this phenomenon. This review examines the available evidence about the effects of synthetic, non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on CVD risk. This is an important issue for clinicians when deciding on individual treatment plans in patients with rheumatic diseases. Evidence suggests that synthetic, non-biologic DMARDs such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide and tofacitinib show decreased CVD morbidity and mortality. However, the strongest data in favour of a reduction in CVD events in rheumatoid patients are shown with methotrexate, which has been the focus of most studies. Adequate proof for a favourable effect also exists for hydroxychloroquine. Larger, prospective studies and randomized clinical trials are needed to better characterize the effect of synthetic, non-biologic DMARDs on CVD outcomes in these patients. Design of future studies should include areas with lack of evidence, such as the risk for heart failure, arrhythmias and valvular heart disease. The clinically relevant question whether synthetic, non-biologic DMARDs are inferior to biologic DMARDs in terms of CVD outcomes remains not adequately addressed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570161117666190930113837DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

synthetic non-biologic
20
non-biologic dmards
12
cardiovascular risk
8
non-biologic disease-modifying
8
drugs dmards
8
dmards cvd
8
cvd outcomes
8
dmards
6
cvd
6
synthetic
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!