A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Bag-in-the-lens implantation helps avoid posterior synechiae of the iris after phacovitrectomy. | LitMetric

Bag-in-the-lens implantation helps avoid posterior synechiae of the iris after phacovitrectomy.

J Cataract Refract Surg

CHU de Caen, Department of Ophthalmology, Caen, France; Centre Ophtalmologique du Pays des Olonnes, Olonne-sur-Mer, France; INSERM, U 1075 COMETE, Pôle de formation et de recherche en santé, Caen, France.

Published: October 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the occurrence of posterior synechiae of the iris (PSI) after two types of lens implantation during phacovitrectomy: lens-in-the-bag (LIB) and bag-in-the-lens (BIL).
  • Conducted at the CHU de Caen in France, the retrospective study analyzed 100 cases from 2013 to 2016, focusing on the PSI rates between the two groups and considering various risk factors.
  • Results showed a dramatically lower PSI rate in the BIL group (2%) compared to the LIB group (40%), suggesting that BIL implantation may nearly eliminate the risk of PSI.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare the rate of posterior synechiae of the iris (PSI) occurrence after phacovitrectomy between a group with lens-in-the-bag (LIB) implantation, that is, implantation in the capsular bag, and a group with bag-in-the-lens (BIL) implantation.

Setting: CHU de Caen, Department of Ophthalmology, Caen, France.

Design: Comparative retrospective study.

Methods: One hundred consecutive cases of phacovitrectomies conducted between May 2013 and July 2016 were included. A retrospective analysis of the occurrence rate of PSI in the LIB group and in the BIL group was performed, using multivariate analysis including multiple risk factors such as preoperative synechiae, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, use of 20-gauge vitrectomy, use of gas or silicone tamponade, and use of endophotocoagulation.

Results: One hundred eyes of 92 patients were included in this study (55 eyes in the LIB group and 45 in the BIL group). The occurrence of PSI was significantly lower in the BIL group with 1 case (2%) versus 22 cases (40%) in the LIB group (P < .001). Among the risk factors studied, preoperative synechiae and the use of retinal endophotocoagulation were almost significantly associated with the occurrence of PSI (P = .068 and P = .087, respectively). In the LIB group, these PSI led to 1 case of acute elevation of intraocular pressure by pupillary seclusion and the use of laser iridotomy in 8 cases.

Conclusion: The use of BIL rather than LIB implantation in phacovitrectomy practically eliminates PSI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.05.054DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lib group
12
bil group
12
posterior synechiae
8
group
8
group bil
8
bag-in-the-lens implantation
4
implantation helps
4
helps avoid
4
avoid posterior
4
synechiae iris
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!