Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

AJR Am J Roentgenol

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, 3rd Fl Main Bldg, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903.

Published: December 2019

The objective of this study was to compare the yield of dense breast ultrasound (US) screening after digital mammography (DM) versus after digital breast tomosyn-thesis (DBT). For this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, we retrospectively searched databases at two tertiary breast imaging centers and an office practice staffed by the same fellowship-trained breast radiologists for screening US examinations from October 1, 2014, to September 30, 2016. Prior DM versus DBT and screening US and pathology results were recorded. Mammographically occult cancers detected with US and additional benign lesions requiring biopsy were calculated. Differences between DM and DBT were compared using the two-sample proportions test. A total of 3183 screening breast US examinations were performed, 1434 (45.1%) after DM and 1668 (52.4%) after DBT. Of the 3183 examinations, 81 (2.5%) had no prior mammogram available. Of the 122 DM and DBT patients for whom biopsy or cyst aspiration was recommended (all BI-RADS assessment category 4 or BI-RADS assessment category 5 studies), 118 (96.7%) had biopsy or cyst aspiration results available. Of the 36 biopsies or aspirations after DM, 6 (16.7%) were malignant and 30 (83.3%) were benign; of the 82 biopsies or aspirations after DBT, 11 (13.4%) were malignant and 71 (86.6%) were benign ( = 0.8583). The additional cancer detection rate by US after DM was 5/1434 or 3.5 per 1000 women screened and after DBT was 5/1668 or 3.0 per 1000 women screened ( = 0.9999). No significant difference in additional cancer detection rate was found with screening US after DM versus after DBT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20748DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dense breast
8
breast ultrasound
8
ultrasound screening
8
screening digital
8
digital mammography
8
mammography versus
8
versus digital
8
digital breast
8
dbt
8
versus dbt
8

Similar Publications

Background: A significant proportion of false positive recalls of mammography-screened women is due to benign breast cysts and simple fibroadenomas. These lesions appear mammographically as smooth-shaped dense masses and require the recalling of women for a breast ultrasound to obtain complementary imaging information. They can be identified safely by ultrasound with no need for further assessment or treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nanoparticles have gained attention as drug delivery vehicles for cancer treatment, but often struggle with poor tumor accumulation and penetration. Single external magnets can enhance magnetic nanoparticle delivery but are limited to superficial tumors due to the rapid decline in the magnetic field strength with distance. We previously showed that a 2-magnet device could extend targeting to greater tissue depths.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Microscopic imaging aids disease diagnosis by describing quantitative cell morphology and tissue size. However, the high spatial resolution of these images poses significant challenges for manual quantitative evaluation. This project proposes using computer-aided analysis methods to address these challenges, enabling rapid and precise clinical diagnosis, course analysis, and prognostic prediction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: In light of evolving evidence that some patients with node-positive estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) disease may receive less benefit from chemotherapy, this study reports 12-year outcomes of the C9741 trial overall, and by the sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET2,3) test index, a biomarker measuring endocrine transcriptional activity, to identify patients most likely to benefit from dose-dense chemotherapy.

Methods: In all, 1,973 patients were randomly assigned to dose-dense versus conventional chemotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) for prognosis and for predictive interaction with chemotherapy schedule were estimated from Cox models of long-term disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Conformable Ultrasound Breast Patch - The Future of Breast Cancer Screening?

Eur J Breast Health

January 2025

Division of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer type among women worldwide with an average lifetime risk of 12.9%. Early detection and screening are the most important factors for improved prognosis and mammography remains the main screening tool for the average risk patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!