A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Deep Learning for Smartphone-Based Malaria Parasite Detection in Thick Blood Smears. | LitMetric

Objective: This work investigates the possibility of automated malaria parasite detection in thick blood smears with smartphones.

Methods: We have developed the first deep learning method that can detect malaria parasites in thick blood smear images and can run on smartphones. Our method consists of two processing steps. First, we apply an intensity-based Iterative Global Minimum Screening (IGMS), which performs a fast screening of a thick smear image to find parasite candidates. Then, a customized Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) classifies each candidate as either parasite or background. Together with this paper, we make a dataset of 1819 thick smear images from 150 patients publicly available to the research community. We used this dataset to train and test our deep learning method, as described in this paper.

Results: A patient-level five-fold cross-evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of the customized CNN model in discriminating between positive (parasitic) and negative image patches in terms of the following performance indicators: accuracy (93.46% ± 0.32%), AUC (98.39% ± 0.18%), sensitivity (92.59% ± 1.27%), specificity (94.33% ± 1.25%), precision (94.25% ± 1.13%), and negative predictive value (92.74% ± 1.09%). High correlation coefficients (>0.98) between automatically detected parasites and ground truth, on both image level and patient level, demonstrate the practicality of our method.

Conclusion: Promising results are obtained for parasite detection in thick blood smears for a smartphone application using deep learning methods.

Significance: Automated parasite detection running on smartphones is a promising alternative to manual parasite counting for malaria diagnosis, especially in areas lacking experienced parasitologists.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.2939121DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep learning
16
parasite detection
16
thick blood
16
detection thick
12
blood smears
12
malaria parasite
8
learning method
8
smear images
8
thick smear
8
parasite
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!