The Pros and Cons of the Prediction Game: The Never-ending Debate of Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 14 Medykow Street, 40752 Katowice, Poland.

Published: September 2019

Background: The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scales are scoring systems used in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. We aimed to investigate their usefulness in predicting short- and long-term prognosis in the local ICU.

Methods: This single-center observational study covered 905 patients admitted from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017 to a tertiary mixed ICU. SAPS II, APACHE II, and SOFA scores were calculated based on the worst values from the first 24 h post-admission. Patients were divided into surgical (SP) and nonsurgical (NSP) subjects. Unadjusted ICU and post-ICU discharge mortality rates were considered the outcomes.

Results: Baseline SAPS II, APACHE II, and SOFA scores were 41.1 ± 20.34, 14.07 ± 8.73, and 6.33 ± 4.12 points, respectively. All scores were significantly lower among SP compared to NSP ( < 0.05). ICU mortality reached 35.4% and was significantly lower for SP (25.3%) than NSP (57.9%) ( < 0.001). The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.826, 0.836, and 0.788 for SAPS II, APACHE II, and SOFA scales, respectively, for predicting ICU prognosis, and 0.708, 0.709, and 0.661 for SAPS II, APACHE II, and SOFA, respectively, for post-ICU prognosis.

Conclusions: Although APACHE II and SAPS II are good predictors of ICU mortality, they failed to predict survival after discharge. Surgical patients had a better prognosis than medical ICU patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766032PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183394DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

saps apache
16
apache sofa
16
intensive care
8
acute physiology
8
sofa scales
8
sofa scores
8
icu mortality
8
saps
6
apache
6
icu
6

Similar Publications

Objectives: Patients with sepsis are often comorbid with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and the phenotypic characteristics of pulmonary and non-pulmonary infections leading to ARDS are still unclear. This study aimed to compare the phenotypic characteristics of ARDS resulting from pulmonary infections and other non-site infections and provide better guidance for clinical treatment.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter cohort analysis using data from the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV), and the electronic intensive care unit (eICU) databases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

(1) Background: Knowledge about the behavior of antibiotics in critically ill patients has been increasing in recent years. Some studies have concluded that a high percentage may be outside the therapeutic range. The most likely cause of this is the pharmacokinetic variability of critically ill patients, but it is not clear which factors have the greatest impact.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background and aim A variety of scoring systems are employed in intensive care units (ICUs) with the objective of predicting patient morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to compare four different severity assessment scoring systems, namely, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (SAPS II) to predict prognosis of all patients admitted to a mixed medical ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in central India. Methods The prospective observational study included 1136 patients aged 18 years or more, admitted to the mixed medical ICU.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Sepsis is a severe medical condition that can be life-threatening. If sepsis progresses to septic shock, the mortality rate increases to around 40%, much higher than the 10% mortality observed in sepsis. Diabetes increases infection and sepsis risk, making management complex.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) can be primary or secondary, with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) are defined as infections where no clear infection source is identified, while secondary BSIs originate from a localized infection site. This study aims to compare patterns, outcomes, and medical costs between primary and secondary BSIs and identify associated factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!