Premise: Water availability is an important abiotic factor, resulting in differences between plant species growing in xeric and mesic habitats. Species with populations occurring in both habitat types allow examination of whether water availability has acted as a selective force at the intraspecific level. Investigating responses to water availability with a dioecious species allows determination of whether males and females, which often have different physiologies and life histories, respond differently.
Methods: An experiment varying water availability was performed under an outdoor rain-out shelter using plants from two mesic and two xeric populations of the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Early growth rate, flowering propensity, flower size, and specific leaf area were measured. At the end of the season, the plants were harvested, aboveground and root biomass were measured, and the total number of flowers and fruit produced were counted.
Results: Compared to the two mesic populations, plants from the two xeric populations grew more slowly, were less likely to flower, took longer to flower, had thicker leaves, invested less in aboveground biomass and more in root biomass, produced fewer flowers and fruit, but were more likely to live. Many traits exhibited significant habitat type × treatment interactions. Compared to the xeric populations, males-but not females-from mesic populations had less root biomass and greatly reduced their flower production in response to low water availability.
Conclusions: Mesic and xeric populations responded in ways congruent with water availability being a selective force for among-population divergence, especially for males.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1359 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!