Going Beyond "Not Enough Time": Barriers to Preparing Manuscripts for Academic Medical Journals.

Teach Learn Med

Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Published: June 2020

: Many researchers have difficulty transforming raw data into publishable full-length manuscripts. Among studies presented at professional meetings, registered as clinical trials, or declined from specific journals, nonpublication rates are estimated to range from 25% to 60%. We aimed to characterize major barriers to manuscript preparation, beyond lack of time, for academics from a broad range of specialties at a tertiary academic medical institution. We explored whether major barriers evolved with increasing publishing experience. : We surveyed registrants of 12 noncompulsory workshops on scientific publishing (April 2009-November 2015). Survey respondents indicated how many of their coauthored papers were accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals in the past 5 years and stated what they found most difficult about preparing a manuscript, other than lack of time. Two investigators performed a content analysis of the reported barriers; mean agreement between coders was 98% ( = 2%), and the mean Scott π coefficient for interrater reliability was 0.81 ( = 0.26). We used a multimethod analytic approach to determine whether the perceived barriers varied with level of publishing experience. : Surveys were returned by 201 of 256 registrants (79%). Thirty-eight percent of respondents had lower publishing experience (0-4 papers published in peer-reviewed journals in the past 5 years), 26% had medium experience (5-10 papers), and 35% had higher experience (>10 papers). Many respondents (57%) listed multiple barriers, but 5% listed zero barriers. The content analysis of the 370 reported barrier items identified 8 categories covering 38 concepts. The most common concerns (i.e., organization, writing, following journal format, defining the article scope, disliking writing, responding to reviewers) were not affected by author experience level. However, significantly more academics with higher experience expressed concerns about data presentation. : Academics commonly reported barriers such as uncertainty about how to organize content, difficulty with developing succinct text, and frustration about meeting journal-specific formatting requirements. Greater experience in scientific publishing did not appear to mitigate these barriers. Academic institutions can provide targeted support for persistent challenges to scholarly productivity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904427PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2019.1659144DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

publishing experience
12
barriers
9
academic medical
8
major barriers
8
lack time
8
experience
8
scientific publishing
8
peer-reviewed journals
8
journals 5 years
8
content analysis
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: The etiology of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has been shown to significantly influence baseline parent-reported health-related quality of life (HrQOL). In combining these etiology groups, we obligatorily lump together many disparate diagnoses, particularly true in the neuromuscular (NM) cohort. We sought to evaluate the influence of underlying neuromuscular diagnosis on the HrQOL at 5 years following surgery for EOS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This paper combines the concepts of design thinking and benchmarking in an aseptic manufacturing context. Design thinking is a problem-solving approach that aims to understand user needs, generate ideas, prototypes and test solutions. There are no published examples in the Irish healthcare setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author-group.

J Clin Epidemiol

January 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. Electronic address:

Objective: No published methods for research integrity review include both statistical techniques applied to groups of randomised trials and individual assessment of papers. We propose a method based on practical experience of investigating data integrity across the collected papers of one author or author-group.

Study Design And Setting: We report our approach to investigating the collected papers of an author or author-group suspected of academic misconduct.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: Surgeons' perspectives and recommendations ten years after its implementation.

Eur J Surg Oncol

December 2024

Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Background And Objectives: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for Radical Cystectomy (RC) were published over ten years ago. Aim of this systematic review is to update ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and to give an expert opinion on the relevance of each single ERAS item.

Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify the impact of each single ERAS item on RC outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Lung cancer has the highest incidence and mortality rates globally, making effective post-surgical mental health support crucial due to associated challenges like anxiety and depression.
  • Traditional Chinese medicine shows promise in improving psychological well-being and physical symptoms after lung cancer surgery, but its effectiveness specifically for mental function recovery needs investigation.
  • The study will systematically review various databases for randomized controlled trials focusing on depression and anxiety after lung cancer surgery, assessing data quality and outcomes using established evaluation tools.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!