A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of Several Retightening Protocols for Maintaining Clamping Force in the Implant-Abutment Joint: An In Vitro Pilot Study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two different retightening protocols on the stability of implant-supported restorations.
  • Three groups of slip-fit implants were tested: one group tightened once, another retightened after 10 minutes, and the last retightened after 2 weeks.
  • Results showed that the groups that underwent retightening had significantly less torque loss compared to the group that was only tightened once, indicating that both retightening methods were equally effective in maintaining implant stability.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Stability of an implant-supported restoration is an ultimate measure of the success of the procedure. It has been recommended by some to retighten the abutment screw for maintenance of the crown on the implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of two retightening protocols to maintain the clamping force.

Materials And Methods: Three groups of slip-fit implants (MIS 4.3 by 10.5) were compared. The first group was only tightened once (group C). In the second group (group R10M), the screw was retightened after 10 minutes. The third group (group R2W) was retightened after 2 weeks of simulated functional loading. After completion of individual protocols, all specimens were loaded for 100,000 cycles. After the loading, all specimens had the remaining torque audited.

Results: The mean torque loss for group C was 6.10 (± 5.13) Ncm. Group R10M was 2.03 (± 3.018) Ncm, and group R2W was 0.30 (± 0.483) Ncm. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) recorded significant differences among the groups (P = .003). Multiple pairwise comparisons between groups by Tukey test recorded significant differences between group C vs group R10M (P = .035) and group C vs group R2W (P = .002). There was no significant difference in torque loss between groups R10M and R2W (P = .509).

Conclusion: Within the parameters of this in vitro investigation, it was concluded that both retightening after 10 minutes (P = .035) and after 2 weeks (P = .002) was equally effective.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7426DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group group
16
group
13
group r10m
12
group r2w
12
retightening protocols
8
torque loss
8
ncm group
8
recorded differences
8
efficacy retightening
4
protocols maintaining
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!