: Real-world effectiveness of hemato-oncology pharmaceuticals may not necessarily mimic clinical trial efficacy results, mainly due to demographic and clinical practice variability. The aim of this review was to systematically assess the availability of real-world evidence (RWE) and the transferability of clinical trial (CT) efficacy results to real life, for novel agents recently approved to manage lymphomas, leukemias, and multiple myeloma. This is the largest cross-indication review comparing RWE to CT results, aspiring to inform clinical practice and decision-making when funding hemato-oncology pharmaceuticals.: The review methodology focused on identifying all novel agents that entered EU landscape between 2012 and 2016 by using European Medicines Agency (EMA) database, while conducting a systematic PubMed literature review of RWE in the specific hematological malignancies, in order to compare RWE versus CT efficacy endpoints.: In total, 18 international nonproprietary names (INNs) that received EMA approval for any indication were included and the registrational efficacy results are presented. Eight (44%) INNs proved to have relevant RWE generated in at least one approved indication. The analysis of findings revealed high variability in terms of RWE availability and transferability of CT results to relevant real-life experience among the disease areas investigated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2019.1668763DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

novel agents
12
multiple myeloma
8
hemato-oncology pharmaceuticals
8
clinical trial
8
trial efficacy
8
clinical practice
8
rwe
6
unraveling innovation
4
innovation potential
4
potential real-world
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!