A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of the PECARN head trauma prediction rules in Japan: A multicenter prospective study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Head trauma is a common reason for emergency visits in children, and while most cases are minor, identifying serious injuries is difficult; PECARN rules are widely used for assessing head trauma risk but haven’t been tested extensively in Asia.* -
  • This study aimed to see if PECARN rules are applicable to Japanese children by conducting a multicenter study involving 6 hospitals and over 6,500 children with minor head trauma.* -
  • The results showed an excellent negative predictive value of 99.96%, suggesting the PECARN rules can be safely used in Japan, though more research is needed in less experienced hospitals.*

Article Abstract

Background: Head trauma in children is one of the most common causes for emergency department visits. Although most trauma cases are minor, identifying those patients who have clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) is challenging. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) head trauma prediction rules identifying children who do not require cranial computed tomography (CT) were validated and are used all over the world. However, these rules have not been validated with large cohort multicenter studies in Asia.

Objectives: To investigate whether the PECARN rules can be safely applied to Japanese children.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study. We included children younger than 16 with minor head trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥14) who presented to the six participating centers within 24 h of their injuries between June 2016 and September 2017. The primary analysis was set to calculate the negative predictive value of the patients with very low risk by the PECARN rules, compared with a preset threshold of 99.85%.

Results: We included 6585 children of which 463 (7.0%) had head CT scans performed and 23 (0.35%) had ciTBI. There were two patients with ciTBI who were classified as very low risk. The negative predictive value, calculated as 99.96% (95%CI: 99.86-100.00; P = .019), was significantly superior compared with the preset threshold of 99.85%.

Conclusions: The PECARN head trauma prediction rules seemed to be safely applicable to Japanese children. Further studies are needed to determine safety in hospitals where physicians do not have expertise in managing children.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158439DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

head trauma
20
pecarn head
12
trauma prediction
12
prediction rules
12
multicenter prospective
8
pecarn rules
8
rules safely
8
negative predictive
8
low risk
8
compared preset
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!