A low-complexity and robust minimum variance beamformer for ultrasound imaging systems using beamspace dominant mode rejection.

Ultrasonics

Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, India.

Published: February 2020

Minimum variance beamformer (MVB) has a high computational complexity that is mainly due to the inversion of an L×L covariance matrix involved during weight vector estimation, where L is the length of the subarray. In this work an attempt is made to reduce the computational complexity as well as increase the robustness against signal mismatch. The computational complexity is reduced by projecting the element-space data on to beamspace domain and then using dominant mode rejection on the beamspace covariance matrix (BCM). This reduces the dimension of covariance matrix and also eliminates the matrix inversion thereby reducing the computational complexity. Further, a closeness factor is introduced to determine the interference components that have to be suppressed, leading to increased robustness against signal mismatch. Performance of the proposed method has been evaluated on both simulated and experimental datasets. Results indicate that the proposed beamformer has a lateral resolution of 0.07 mm and a contrast resolution of 0.80, which are comparable to that of MVB which has a lateral and contrast resolution of 0.10 mm and 0.78, that too with a 12-fold reduction in computational complexity. The robustness of the peak magnitude estimate and spatial resolution of the beamformer with respect to error in estimation of sound velocity in the medium have also been evaluated. The variation in lateral resolution of proposed beamformer and MVB is approximately 1.21 mm and 1 mm. Further, the proposed beamformer has a maximum deviation in peak magnitude estimate of 0.7 dB whereas that of MVB is 2.5 dB, thus indicating the increased robustness of proposed method in peak magnitude estimate. Overall, the proposed beamformer has a 12-fold lower computational complexity compared to MVB with additional flexibility to increase the robustness against error in sound velocity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2019.105979DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computational complexity
24
proposed beamformer
16
covariance matrix
12
peak magnitude
12
magnitude estimate
12
minimum variance
8
variance beamformer
8
dominant mode
8
mode rejection
8
beamformer mvb
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!