Visual Perceptual Load Does Not Affect the Frequency Mismatch Negativity.

Front Psychol

Gösta Ekmans Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Published: August 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The mismatch negativity (MMN) is significant in studying auditory perception as it detects changes in sound by comparing deviant and standard tones during an oddball task.
  • Recent research aimed to explore whether visual task difficulty affects MMN, but this study, using rigorous methods, found no strong evidence for such an effect, challenging earlier biased findings.
  • Additionally, working memory capacity did not show a correlation with how visual load impacted MMN, reinforcing that auditory processing remains stable despite varying visual demands.

Article Abstract

The mismatch negativity (MMN) has been of particular interest in auditory perception because of its sensitivity to auditory change. It is typically measured in an oddball task and is computed as the difference of deviant minus standard tones. Previous studies suggest that the oddball MMN can be reduced by crossmodal attention to a concurrent, difficult visual task. However, more recent studies did not replicate this effect. Because previous findings seem to be biased, we preregistered the present study and used Bayesian hypothesis testing to measure the strength of evidence for or against an effect of visual task difficulty. We manipulated visual perceptual load (high and low load). In the task, the visual stimuli were identical for both loads to avoid confounding effects from physical differences of the visual stimuli. We also measured the corrected MMN because the oddball MMN may be confounded by physical differences between deviant and standard tones. The corrected MMN is obtained with a separate control condition in which the same tone as the deviant (critical tone) is equiprobable with other tones. The corrected MMN is computed as deviant minus critical tones. Furthermore, we assessed working memory capacity to examine its moderating role. In our large sample ( = 49), the evidential strength in support of no effect of visual load was moderate for the oddball MMN (9.09 > BF01 > 3.57) and anecdotal to moderate for the corrected MMN (4.55 > BF01 > 2.17). Also, working memory capacity did not correlate with the visual load effect on the oddball MMN and the corrected MMN. The present findings support the robustness of the auditory frequency MMN to manipulations of crossmodal, visual attention and suggest that this relationship is not moderated by working memory capacity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719510PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01970DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

corrected mmn
20
oddball mmn
16
working memory
12
memory capacity
12
mmn
11
visual
9
visual perceptual
8
perceptual load
8
mismatch negativity
8
deviant minus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!