Preoperative CT Classification of the Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer: Interobserver Agreement.

Radiology

From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea (I.J., J.M.L., D.H.L., H.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (I.J., J.M.L., D.H.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (E.S.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea (J.Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea (S.J.A.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea (W.C.); Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea (S.M.L.); and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (H.K.Y.).

Published: November 2019

Background Accurate assessment of local resectability of pancreatic cancer at initial workup is critical to determine the most appropriate management strategy among up-front operation, neoadjuvant treatment, or palliative treatment. Purpose To investigate the interobserver agreement of the preoperative CT classification of the local resectability of pancreatic cancer and to determine if radiologist experience level impacts evaluation, and to evaluate the reader performance in assessing resectability at CT in a subset of patients with a reference standard for local resectability. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was composed of patients with pathologic-analysis-confirmed pancreatic cancers between January 2013 and December 2014 who underwent baseline multiphasic contrast agent-enhanced CT. Eight board-certified radiologists with different levels of experience (more experienced, ≥6 years, = 4; less experienced, 1st- or 2nd-year fellows, = 4) reviewed the CT images and classified cancers as resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable. Interobserver agreements were determined for all reviewers and subgroups of reviewers stratified according to experience (more vs less) by using Fleiss κ statistics. In patients with reference standards for local resectability, diagnostic performances of each reviewer were assessed by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results There were 110 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 11; 60 men) who were evaluated. Overall interobserver agreements were moderate for resectability classification (κ = 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.45, 0.50). Only 30.0% of patients (33 of 110) were given the same resectability classification from all reviewers. More experienced reviewers demonstrated higher agreement in category assignments than less experienced reviewers (κ = 0.55 [95% confidence interval: 0.50, 0.60] vs 0.43 [95% confidence interval: 0.38, 0.49], respectively). For prediction at CT of margin-negative (ie, R0) resections ( = 82), areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of all reviewers were greater than 0.80 (range, 0.83-0.96). However, borderline resectable cancers showed diverse R0 rates ranging from 0% to 74% depending on the reviewers. Conclusion Considerable interobserver variability exists in the assignment at CT of the local resectability of pancreatic cancer, even among experienced radiologists. © RSNA, 2019

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190422DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

local resectability
20
resectability pancreatic
16
pancreatic cancer
16
confidence interval
12
resectability
9
preoperative classification
8
interobserver agreement
8
patients reference
8
borderline resectable
8
interobserver agreements
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!