Comparative analysis of genitourinary function after type C1 robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus type C2 robotic radical hysterectomy.

Surg Oncol

Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Center of Hope, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA. Electronic address:

Published: September 2019

Background: To compare the return of bladder function and genitourinary complications after type C1 robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (C1-RRH) to type C2 robotic radical hysterectomy (C2-RRH) in gynecologic cancers.

Methods: A retrospective analysis between C1-RRH (n = 42) and C2-RRH (n = 43) was performed. Operative outcomes and perioperative genitourinary complications between the two groups were analyzed.

Results: The C1-RRH group had shorter hospitalization (0.7 vs. 1.7 days, p < 0.001) and shorter DUC (1 vs. 28 days, p < 0.001). About 76% of C1-RRH group required a catheter for less than 1 week while 84% of the C2-RRH group did for more than 1 week (54% for 1-6 weeks; 30% > 6 weeks). In spite of the short stay after surgery (95% of C1-RRH ≤ 1 day), only two patients (4.8%) in C1-RRH group were admitted again because of urinary tract infection. C1-RRH was only independent predictor for early bladder function return within 1 week after surgery.

Conclusion: The C1-RRH showed early bladder function return and feasible outcomes in spite of early discharge. It can be considered as the first surgical option in gynecologic cancer patients who need RH to preserve their bladder function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

type robotic
16
radical hysterectomy
16
robotic nerve-sparing
8
nerve-sparing radical
8
robotic radical
8
genitourinary complications
8
comparative analysis
4
analysis genitourinary
4
genitourinary function
4
type
4

Similar Publications

Introduction:: Surgical training is a constant exchange between trainers and trainees, and intraoperative surgical feedback is an integral part of learning. New technologies in robotic surgery allow for the delivery of visual aid and verbal feedback intraoperatively, but it has not yet been determined if feedback type affects the trainee learning process.

Methods:: 49 novice participants were recruited and randomized into four feedback groups: , , of verbal/visual, and no feedback ().

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Advanced technologies are becoming increasingly accessible in rehabilitation. Current research suggests technology can increase therapy dosage, provide multisensory feedback, and reduce manual handling for clinicians. While more high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of rehabilitation technologies is needed, understanding of how to effectively integrate technology into clinical practice is also limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A unified model for droplet receding contact angles on hydrophobic pillar, pore, and hollowed pillar arrays.

J Colloid Interface Sci

December 2024

Department of Mechanical Engineering (Robotics), Guangdong Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou, Guangdong 515063, China.

Hypothesis: Current models for receding contact angles of Cassie-Baxter state droplets on textured hydrophobic substrates are applicable only to a specific structural type, e.g., pillar (above which a droplet has isolated contact line and continuous liquid-vapor interface) or pore (continuous contact line and isolated liquid-vapor interface), signifying a lack of universality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Accuracy of robot-assisted implant surgery versus freehand placement: a retrospective clinical study.

Int J Implant Dent

January 2025

Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Purpose: This study evaluated the accuracy of implant placement using a robotic system (Remebot) compared to freehand surgery and explored factors influencing accuracy.

Methods: This retrospective study included 95 implants placed in 65 patients, divided into robot-assisted (50 implants) and freehand (45 implants) groups. Platform, apical, and angular deviations were measured by superimposing preoperative plans and the postoperative CBCT images.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Robot-assisted surgery is readily applied to every type of colorectal surgeries. However, studies showing the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery (RS) have dealt with rectal cancer more than colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate how technical advantages of RS can translate into actual clinical outcomes that represent postoperative systemic response.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!